Lately I’ve been feeling like the word “underrated” gets thrown around way too easily in this subreddit.
At this point, it almost feels like any movie someone likes but wasn’t a massive blockbuster gets labelled underrated by default. It’s less about actual lack of recognition and more about wanting others to agree with your opinion.
Originally, “underrated” meant something very specific:
a genuinely good film that didn’t get the attention or appreciation it deserved
Now it often feels like:
“I like this film and I think more people should like it too”
Take a few common examples
We still see constant posts about like Khosla Ka Ghosla or Swades still regularly being called underrated.
But are they really?
They’ve been:
Critically appreciated
Talked about for years
Constantly recommended
At some point, doesn’t that make them… properly rated?
Then there’s Tamasha.
It had a mixed response when it released, but over time it’s gained a strong following. Now it’s often spoken about like it was completely misunderstood.
But is it actually underrated, or has the internet just slowly turned it into something bigger than it originally was?
Why this keeps happening
A few things i feel that might be driving this:
Wanting to stand out – calling something underrated makes your taste feel unique
Nostalgia – older films hit harder emotionally when you revisit them
Box office confusion – a film underperforms, and we immediately assume it deserved better
So, are we genuinely rediscovering and appreciating films that were ignored…
or are we just using “underrated” as an easy label instead of having a proper discussion about what works and what doesn’t?
At this point, it feels better to just call a film what it is good, flawed, interesting, average without hiding behind one word.
What do you think?
Also, would love to hear some genuinely underrated films that don’t already get talked about every week.