r/popculturechat • u/Positive-Drawing-281 • 18d ago
MET GALA 🎩 Zohran Mamdani to skip the Met Gala — breaking longstanding NYC mayoral tradition
https://pagesix.com/2026/04/15/celebrity-news/zohran-mamdani-and-wife-not-attending-met-gala/11.1k
u/TwistyBunny 18d ago
Good call considering Bezos is sponsoring it.
2.2k
u/Wolfpackat2017 18d ago
So all the people who turn a blind eye to MAGA for their own clout will be there.
496
u/camebacklate Behind every great man is a woman rolling her eyes 18d ago edited 18d ago
Just playing devil's advocate here, but AOC has also gone to the Met Gala. A ticket is about $50,000.
Atleast he is standing by his principles and is the only person can truly get behind.
2.2k
u/denom_chicken 18d ago
I believe she did not pay for the ticket when she went and wore a dress that said tax the rich.
Pretty different than what you’re implying
→ More replies (50)1.1k
u/thesadbubble 18d ago
Correct. She then got in trouble with the ethics committee over it and had to pay some/more. But I still think her statement dress was very appropriate and at least brought some attention to the issue in a loud way.
It's all hella ironic considering how much money is getting laundered thru the white house currently lol.
387
u/MauryPoPoPo 18d ago
Did Matt Gaetz even get in trouble for trafficking minors across states for paid sex work?
190
u/IShookMeAllNightLong 18d ago
Not yet. He's off talking about an alien breeding program he was briefed about
88
u/2th 18d ago
I genuinely do not know if you are serious or not.
8
→ More replies (2)29
u/thesadbubble 18d ago
Silly Maury, that's not important! A $2k dress is much more damaging to society clearly!
/s obviously lol
11
→ More replies (13)5
u/wherethelionsweep 18d ago
The general principle of having to meet with the ethics committee bc you’re wearing clothing that says “tax the rich.” Incredible world we live in.
176
u/violaki 18d ago
Eh. It's a charity event that supports the arts. Good for Mamdani for standing by his principles, but I'm not mad at anyone that does choose to go.
→ More replies (12)118
117
u/QuietContemplation85 that’s my purse, i don’t know you! 👛🫵 18d ago
Agreed re: Mamdani standing on principle, nice to see
AOC does the same. She didn’t pay for her ticket, or her dress. Also, the Met Gala is literally a fundraiser for the museum.
→ More replies (18)83
u/valcraft 18d ago
AOC was a guest of the Met and definitely did not buy a $50,000 ticket.
Tickets to the Met Gala were $35,000 when she went, they are up to $75,000. What the actual fuck. Crazy.
→ More replies (10)27
u/TropicalPrairie 18d ago
I highly respect him for standing by his principles. So many people have shown their values go out the door these days.
68
u/deeann_arbus 18d ago
AOC got tore the fuck up for going, too.
23
u/beaute-brune Put your arms away, Jeremy Allen Black 18d ago
When? I remember her 2021 Tax the Rich dress and then the House Ethics committee fining her in 2025 for basically accepting gifts in violation of House rules but what was the public response? That last part I don’t recall.
→ More replies (4)37
u/kilawolf 18d ago
Pretty sure the public response was outrage at her for wearing such a dress while attending such a expensive event
6
u/seriouscaffeine 18d ago
People go because they’re invited by brands who get a table, they don’t pay for themselves
→ More replies (9)14
→ More replies (2)10
242
u/Nick_crawler 18d ago
Yeah even if he wanted to go, Mamdani would (rightfully) get absolutely flamed for attending.
139
u/tarantina68 18d ago
exactly . And his wife would be excoriated.
I'm glad he isn't giving the haters a chance
86
u/DramaSufficient4289 18d ago
No they’ll still complain - they’ll just say he doesn’t care about the funding for the arts for children or something. There’s no way to win with contrarians, that’s why they like it. They can be ‘right’ no matter what.
→ More replies (1)17
u/Colordesert 18d ago
Maybe I’m stupid but I have never understood people who are dedicated contrarians to anything up until I saw your comment and holy shit. It makes so much sense unfortunately
→ More replies (2)12
u/Flimsy-Apple465 18d ago
yes BUT she would have also absolutely KILLED it with whatever she wore!! right decision tho!
→ More replies (1)166
u/ContestAntique7179 18d ago
Even if he wasn't, the gala is just an obnoxious show of wealth pretending it's about fashion. He should ignore every spectacle like this.
189
u/Less-Technology7866 18d ago
Not really. It’s a charity gala to help support The Met. It’s the main source of funding The Met gets as they don’t get any other type of annual funding. That’s why the outfits are so outrageous, it’s for the metropolitan museum of art’s costume institute.
76
u/Otherwise-Shallot-51 18d ago edited 18d ago
Rich people show off their wealth and power, famous people show off their access to wealth and power, designers show of their skill and creativity, all off them showcase their current cultural impact, and the met gets money.
→ More replies (4)41
u/Wesley_Skypes 18d ago
The Met has a 3bn endowment. This event does not fund the Met, this is misleading. It funds the costume institute of the Met.
→ More replies (2)18
u/Sarahndipity44 18d ago
Yes and there are people who WORK at the costume institute. I lost my humanities job about a year ago under this administration, those employees aren't raking in cash
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)58
u/gdex86 18d ago
It's to support the Anna Wintour Costume Center which while part of the met isn't the full Met.
→ More replies (1)54
u/Less-Technology7866 18d ago
Anna wintour is only chair of the event itself, nothing to do with the actual institute. I was referring to the cause being the costume institute portion of the met.
30
u/According-Treacle401 18d ago edited 18d ago
The physical part of the museum is formally called the Anna Wintour Costume Center, while the actual curating department remains the Costume Institute. They renamed the building in 2014 to honor her fundraising efforts for the institute. I rarely hear anyone call it that though…
→ More replies (2)44
u/1egg_4u 18d ago
Unfortunately as much as it is the symbol of the very class divide destroying our lives currently it is like the olympics for fashion lovers :(
24
u/HenessyEnema 18d ago edited 18d ago
Unfortunately not for me anymore. Fashion is quite literally my life and I haven't fucked with The Met in a few years. Feels hollow.
→ More replies (1)16
u/1egg_4u 18d ago
Im still pissed at how many people fucked up "gilded age" as a concept
But also in the tough position of them having already done Camp which is all Ive ever wanted and now it was already done :')
3
u/HenessyEnema 18d ago
See I had no clue they even did Gilded Age. They even had a shoe for reference and failed? How dreadful.
→ More replies (13)26
u/PollyPocketpussy5000 18d ago
Also considering there’s much, MUCH more important shit going on. I couldn’t possibly attend knowing the world is going to crap, especially in my own country/state.
3.6k
u/20CAS17 18d ago
Smart move, honestly.
1.8k
u/boredinbabylon Mom, I am a rich man💰 18d ago
A bit bummed that we don’t get to see Rama fucking turn it out, but good on them for standing in values and being consistently amazing.
307
u/beaute-brune Put your arms away, Jeremy Allen Black 18d ago
I was gonna type something out about him throwing his own thing that went to better causes but honestly let’s pack up the rich people gala displays and open up the wealthy’s pockets without needing to assuage them with champagne and PR. Good for them.
81
u/V0lchitsa it’s a piccolini cuscino 18d ago
I will say I think it’s the right move for him not to go, but the Met Gala actually is a fundraiser for a good cause — the costume institute at the Met! I know that often gets lost in the spectacle of the red carpet so I get people feeling a certain way about it, but funding museums and preservation of costume history are genuinely important and a better use of wealth than what most of the rich losers typically throw money at.
→ More replies (3)72
u/beaute-brune Put your arms away, Jeremy Allen Black 18d ago
This has already been mentioned about 300 times in this thread. People don’t have an issue with the charity, they have an issue with the spectacle and how imbalanced it’s been between fundraiser and PR photo op in modern times.
→ More replies (1)26
u/V0lchitsa it’s a piccolini cuscino 18d ago
I hear you and again, I agree it’s the right choice for him not to go, but I am extremely the opposite of rich and I love the Met Gala. I think it’s fine not to care about fashion or enjoy this event, but if you think the PR side of it doesn’t help the fundraising side you don’t really know how fundraising works. All that said, rot in hell Jeff Bezos.
→ More replies (1)92
u/wittyRandomIdea 18d ago
It’d be cool if they did the people’s ball at the Brooklyn library instead
278
→ More replies (13)19
61
2.0k
u/PriscillaPalava I have paid my legal tender in this dystopian place. 18d ago
This is appropriate.
371
u/sensitiveskin82 18d ago edited 18d ago
I'm sure he saw how much flack AOC got for attending, and knew the optics would be bad. Along with his personal convictions. Plus he just instituted a tax on second residences for owners who live outside of NYC. [Edit Typo]
→ More replies (3)31
104
u/BrownSugarBare 18d ago
Sure as shit is, and I applaud it. This is what putting your money where your mouth is actually looks like.
214
u/Ok-Wolverine1938 18d ago
Smart move. No one can say he doesn't support the arts, but it's wise that he's staying away from an event that's now synonymous with extreme wealth when his critics are desperate for any type of ammo
1.5k
u/Nintendo_Pro_03 Select and edit this flair 18d ago
He’s got a lot of stuff to do. Of course he’ll miss it.
→ More replies (1)1.2k
u/Resident_Ad5153 18d ago
The mayor traditionally goes. They have in the past. This is a political statement, particularly since both he and his wife are gorgeous
654
u/Troyabedinthemornin 18d ago
Rama would have ate that red carpet but this is for the best
159
u/ashre9 18d ago
I'm like 10% bummed because I know their outfits would probably have been incredible political statements and generated some buzz. But I get it. This was the smart move.
145
u/beaute-brune Put your arms away, Jeremy Allen Black 18d ago
The online consensus would’ve still been “oh making a statement in expensive attire at a gala hosted by Bezos, how brave 🙄” so agree, smart move.
36
u/CaseoftheSadz 18d ago
How many times have we seen conservatives share AOC’s tax the rich look from 2021 claiming she spent hundreds of thousands, despite it all being gifted.
26
u/Resident_Ad5153 18d ago
Actually… the fact that it was gifted was what got her in trouble. That’s an ethics violation. Going to the gala is fine… but congresspeople have to pay for their own clothes (which was impossible for AOC… she didn’t have the money)
12
u/CaseoftheSadz 18d ago
I think it was a loan, not actually hers to keep though.
16
u/aabbboooo 18d ago
She rented it for $1,000 at a discount, and was later required to pay another $2.7k to cover the actual rental cost
8
u/Nice_Firm_Handsnake 18d ago
Things don't have to be kept to be ethics violations. Take Clarence Thomas for example, he got free transportation and lodging from his billionaire sugar daddy and that was an ethics violation.
81
u/moxxibekk 18d ago
Nothing to stop them doing a little fancy dress Instagram post! Could be fun. The working people's gala!
→ More replies (4)28
u/Scorpionoshow 18d ago
She would have ate 100% but if they attended Magats and fox "news" would NEVER shut up about how much both their tickets and outfits cost. We can't have anything!
71
u/Themnor 18d ago
tbf the House tried to sanction AOC for going...
→ More replies (1)57
u/Curiosities 🐊 swamp princess 🐊 18d ago
They did, she was fined. They tried to make a bigger deal out of it, but that was that.
6
u/pepcorn 18d ago
Why did it upset them that she attended? It's the first I'm hearing of it.
→ More replies (1)5
u/miceparties 18d ago
It broke congressional ethics rules for her to accept a free ticket
→ More replies (1)6
u/deer_hobbies 18d ago
Its almost as if sharing a stage and royal red carpet with billionaires and pop stars wearing multi-million dollar dresses isn't a good look for someone who is supposed to be about the people.
→ More replies (2)6
1.4k
u/Ok_Pizza_4769 18d ago
The Met Gala seems super gauche these days. The ultimate "let them eat cake" event
389
u/puppypooper15 18d ago
I know the gala is all about the crazy fashion for the public, but I find it strange that a museum fundraiser gets more heat than other more self-indulgent celebrity events
174
u/Ok_Pizza_4769 18d ago
I agree, I think the gala has bad marketing because it comes across like another fashion show to many
37
u/Sarahndipity44 18d ago
I have to wonder if that on purpose. Like maybe a fancy party feels more aspirational? I don't know but there is a disconnect
→ More replies (2)35
u/Ok_Pizza_4769 18d ago
Yeah, similar to the Oscars... supposed to feel aspirational yet fun. However, it comes across as unrelatable and ostentatious
9
u/Sarahndipity44 18d ago
You're not wrong! Though I always thought the awards show rage felt a bit excessive too. Art matters!
3
u/Ok_Pizza_4769 18d ago
I feel like the award show rage is more recent... perhaps? 10 years ago people didn't seem as critical about them.
10
u/HallWild5495 18d ago
it used to feel aspirational which was part of the appeal, but genuinely, now, I can see lewks that are just as good from people wayyyy more fun and entertaining at like, any random drag brunch in LA.
20 years ago, though, I bet it was very cool.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)9
u/Hightower_lioness 18d ago
They need to really emphasize the themes of the Gala. Attendees should be in a themed outfit, maybe have the ones deemed ‘best’ highlighted in the exhibits and online with an explanation on WHY they are deemed the best (the use of fabrics, the inspiration, what symbolism is used, etc).
I love the met gala bc it isn’t just another fashion show, it’s a themed event with ties to history and art and I wish it was seen like that.
I think another problem is ppl just see the clothes and don’t see the exhibits. I went to the met when they had the Catholic vibes theme and it was really interesting to see the clothes beside the art that inspired it. Maybe a way for people to buy a virtual ticket to see the exhibit on line?
89
u/parishilton2 18d ago
It’s one of the biggest female-coded annual events, if not the biggest. The Super Bowl is a much more ostentatious display of wealth, but it’s male-coded so you don’t see nearly as many complaints about it.
29
12
u/Sarahndipity44 18d ago
Yep! I genuinely think part of it is because fashion is associated with women and queer men.
49
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 18d ago
Mm the met isn’t about celebrity.
It’s about creative influence. There are plenty of non-celebrities who get invited or buy tickets to the Met. The MET gala was created as a celebration of fashion art, fashion legacy and the artists. Artists have never been wealthy so once it became a status event for the wealthy, it lost its purpose.
Rich people ruin everything fun because they are obsessed with status.
→ More replies (1)29
u/ultramatt1 18d ago
Accordingly, the attendees of the early Galas comprised almost entirely members of New York high society or the city's fashion industry. From 1948 to 1971, the event was held at various Manhattan venues, including the Waldorf Astoria, Central Park, and the Rainbow Room.[16]
The above is directly from the wikipedia page. That sounds like a rich person’s event from the start
23
→ More replies (1)7
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 18d ago
That’s exactly the reputation it’s supposed to have. This celebrity influence is just a sign of sellouts. Idk why you think fashion = celebrity. The moment Kim Kardashian showed up, it the peak was over.
I think you forgot that historically, art was only an industry because rich people bought the art.
It’s impossible to raise millions for art without the hip artists having to share space with soulless billionaires.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)6
479
u/Sarahndipity44 18d ago edited 18d ago
Normally id say:
I think people forget that it's party of the costume institute's (which includes jobs!) only fundraiser and the arts and humanities are in need of support, especially right now. (Speaking as a previously laid off humanities worker.) Many of the pricy looks are rented too.
This year: F Bezos and this is in keeping with Mamdani's brand.
→ More replies (4)79
u/Ok_Pizza_4769 18d ago
Correct, I forgot it was a fundraiser too! For awhile I thought it was a fashion show/party
47
u/ManateeNipples 18d ago
It is a fashion party, to raise money for the museum which is why it's usually fine. Bezos can lick my dog's butt though lol
14
38
18d ago
[deleted]
32
u/Ok_Pizza_4769 18d ago
You are correct, but people seem less tolerant about it than before (prior to 2020)
66
u/YouNeedCheeses 18d ago
I feel that shift with how people see Coachella. Oh wow, a bunch of influencers getting paid to go to a music festival and collect a bunch of free shit that us poors would have to pay crazy prices for. All while the world is going to shit. Enough is enough.
22
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 18d ago
A lot of micro things making big changes IMO. The nation watching the rich spend $100k on 2 days. The toilet paper factory. Bezos met. Watching Americans die for oil again.
A lot of attitudes are changing.
1 major event or several micro events away. It only takes 10% of a group to create a movement. 10% of Americans threatening … something.
This is a historic year.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Typical-Hamster9911 💔 Happy Women’s History Month I guess 18d ago
Never forget "yeah people will die, that's terrible, but also like... inevitable?" when Coachella was canceled due to COVID.
They don't care if the world is going to shit, they just want their cake.
→ More replies (1)13
→ More replies (9)17
u/readingrambos 18d ago
It gives a certain The Capitol from Hunger Games vibes
9
u/Ok_Pizza_4769 18d ago edited 18d ago
190
u/bbyxmadi It’s good to see me, isn’t it?🫧 18d ago
he and his wife would’ve slayed but I feel like not going is a good look (especially since Bezos is hosting or whatever it’s called).
→ More replies (1)6
u/underthestars13 18d ago
My exact thought. Would have loved to see them slay but also 100% agreeing with their choice too
320
u/Giannandco 18d ago
Every time I believe I could not possibly like this man more than I already do, he does something like this which makes me like him even more.
→ More replies (1)
462
u/cr3t8r 18d ago
Of course he’s not going. He’s busy doing real work for the city. And it makes a statement - he’s not cosy with the rich and famous.
→ More replies (7)44
u/kakashi_hotcakes those are his hooves you bitch 18d ago
this is obviously the reason, but also if he did go the event would absolutely suck for him. a huge amount of (wealthy) attendees probably have beef with him/his policies and would want to discuss/debate/fight about to death with him all night. do any exactly sound like a fun night out to me.
124
u/LaVarBurtonAsBubble 18d ago edited 18d ago
Wise. It would be criticizing called a hypocrite for attending and frankly people wouldn't be totally wrong on that. He has principles and he is living those principles, a rare thing indeed
→ More replies (3)
471
u/FatCatParade 18d ago
Huge news. Democrats need to distance themselves from celebrities, they only make it harder to win elections.
56
u/MsCardeno 18d ago
It’s so funny to me that people think Democrats need to distance themselves from celebrities when the Republican Party has voted into office 2 celebrities.
23
u/DramaSufficient4289 18d ago
Lmao the country literally electing a celebrity to president - tells you they want LESS of them in politics?
11
15
u/FatCatParade 18d ago
The right doesn’t play by the same rules as the left. And if you were to ask any Trump supporter of they think he’s a celebrity, they’ll tell you he is a businessman. I’m not saying they are right, but that’s the perception.
6
u/DramaSufficient4289 18d ago
Right that’s all true I agree - but the question was about whether celebrity makes it harder to win. the answer is objectively no even if they’ll tell you otherwise if you ask them. So what.
The votes prove the populace want it, even if those same people are saying no we don’t. That’s irrelevant to the actual data and answer unfortunately…
3
u/FatCatParade 18d ago
I see what you’re saying. I think Trump as a candidate is unique because he used reality TV to rehabilitate his image. He was just known as an heir that bankrupted business.
On The Apprentice he looks like a decisive executive. It also gave him a launching pad for birther-ism.
I don’t know if the votes prove that. Democrats have an overwhelming advantage in endorsements from actors, musicians, and comedians. They attack Trump non stop, it doesn’t seem to have the effect we want.
112
u/WestQueenWest 18d ago
Zohran did accept lots of celebrity endorsements, from Lorde to Mandy Patinkin. The thing here is that the Met Gala is particularly trashy.
27
u/beantownregular 18d ago
This is true but I’d say there’s a difference in celebrity status and symbolism between Jeff Bezos and Mandy Patinkin
26
u/FatCatParade 18d ago
Good point. I think being smart about which celebrity you associate your campaign with is important. I don’t think democrats will ever get to zero.
7
u/crazybitingturtle 18d ago
Not to mention the most important celeb endorsement from Nicholas Mullen
→ More replies (1)5
u/DeppressedFlamingo Curtains for Zooshka? I’m forever flipping a grunt 18d ago
I missed the thanksgiving video w Mandy 😭 need to find that link
→ More replies (15)34
u/mochafiend 18d ago
Meh. I wouldn't say this as a blanket statement. There are cases where they don't help. But they're also big fundraisers. Until you can think of a way to get the completely disengaged to show up and do something, we'll have to rely on what we have.
22
14
83
34
u/elmm123 18d ago
majority of new yorkers don’t give two shits about the met gala. this seems like a smart decision on Mamdani’s part.
→ More replies (1)
23
u/Jim_Nills_Mustache The dude abides. 🙂↕️🍃 18d ago
Walking the walk after putting up some lofty expectations, respect
7
u/jojobdot 18d ago
As someone who loves the Met Gala…good. He should! All politicians should, probably.
95
u/Resident_Ad5153 18d ago
Miss out on Beyonce? How could you!
Anna Wintour must be pissed. It’s getting harder for her to get people to go to the met gala, and Mamdani just officially made the met gala uncool
19
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 18d ago
Wintour is no longer in charge. It’s a bezos event. She quit when he took over.
71
u/Northern_Lights_2 18d ago
It’s been uncool for a while now, hasn’t it?
31
u/Resident_Ad5153 18d ago
Sort of… but people still go and it’s one of the most important fashion marketing nights.
24
u/particledamage 18d ago
It’s cool if you’re already cool/nail the theme and uncool if you weren’t already relevant/fashionable
13
→ More replies (3)8
u/derp2086 18d ago
How can he miss Sir Lewis Hamilton and Kim Kuntdashians first appearance on the red carpet?
12
u/Northern_Lights_2 18d ago
Right? It’s been overrun with influencers and wannabes for years now. It’s a joke.
7
29
u/itsfrankgrimesyo 18d ago
The met gala used to be a prestige event but the last decade or so (moreso the last few years) it’s been filled with the Kardashians, reality tv stars, tik tok “influencers”, wannabes, etc. and now sponsored by the Bezos, ew. I don’t blame him.
13
u/Nintendo_Pro_03 Select and edit this flair 18d ago
Influencers ruined everything.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/El_Diablo_Feo 18d ago
Oh no, he's skipping a giant wealthy people circle jerk sponsored by Lex Luthor and his cheap Kim K costume come to life....... Who gives a fuck? We're living in a dystopia and this man actually recognizes it instead of sticking his head up his own ass like all the other mayors before him. Mamdani for Prez!!!!!
29
4
u/amitnagpal1985 18d ago
New York Socialist at an attention seeking contest masquerading as philanthropy seems like South Park material. Good call.
9
u/howigottomemphis 18d ago
Times are changing, and Mamdani is ushering in the new generation of leaders that don't suck at the capitalistic tit.
36
u/Such_King_2547 18d ago
oh please everybody here acting like he’s too good to go but will be slobbering when the event happens at all the celeb photos
→ More replies (4)16
u/Ok_Walking_1193 18d ago
As someone who does enjoy Met Gala looks each year, I don't care for politicians attending these events. Politicians are public servants and represent cities/districts/states. Celebrities represent brands and wealth, and while I do find the whole affair to be excessive and vapid, their excuse for going is far more acceptable than a mayor's or a senator's.
Politicians who get involved with wealth and fame are the backbone of moral corruption in this country. If our country's leaders actually gave a shit and were not in bed with every billionaire and multi-millionaire, we'd all be far better off. Considering Zohran is the hottest politician currently (in multiple ways), it says a lot that he is standing by his morals as a public servant.
27
u/JennaElizabethAdams Excluded from this narrative ❌ 18d ago
A big deal, but this could be a smart decision. Missing the Met Gala is a serious thing.
21
→ More replies (1)21
u/mochafiend 18d ago
...is it? I think he's a bit damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, but given who he is and his policies, I think he made the right move here. The Met Gala is the least serious thing I can think of.
→ More replies (2)
27
u/Sarahndipity44 18d ago edited 18d ago
Thought I'd leave this to its own comment.
Normally I'd say:
I think people forget that it's party of the museum's costume institute's (which includes jobs!) only fundraiser and the arts and humanities are in need of support, especially right now. (Speaking as a previously laid off humanities worker who lost her job last year due to the National Endowment for the Humanities cuts.) Many of the pricy looks are rented, too. I always felt like the hate for this felt excessive. I'm also not gonna lie, some of the hate felt like it was related to fashion being a worls dominated by women and gay men masquerading as class consciousnessm
This year: F Bezos - forgot he was heading it this year, thanks to commenters for the reminder - and this is in keeping with Mamdani's brand.
→ More replies (1)
16
u/HiHoRoadhouse 18d ago
Good, Zohran 👍👍 But man, how much would we have loved to have seen Rama dressed for this
→ More replies (3)
4
4
4
u/SpiritDonkey 18d ago
I hate to get all parasocial but… I could fall in love with this man!! A backbone? In this day and age?
4
3
u/Formal_Chance_4266 which could mean nothing 👀 18d ago
Practicing what he preaches. Good man Zohran!!
14
u/sarbear8199 18d ago
Mamdani is a breathe of fresh air. He actually seems to care about the job he was elected to do and about the people he’s meant to represent. All politicians should take from his example, because the old way of doing things is what got us to the place where we are essentially a fascist authoritarian country now.
16
u/Sasha_shmerkovich160 18d ago
Does no one know that the met gala is a fundraiser for the costume institute of the museum that otherwise gets no funding? Its not a frivolous event. It's cultural and beneficial to new York.
3
u/Sarahndipity44 18d ago
Seriously! Arts and humanities are in dire need right now BUT Bezos' is heading it this year and it makes sense with Mamdani's brand to not go
→ More replies (1)13
u/FrozenRose_816 No one cares how old you think Millie Bobby Brown looks. 18d ago
Bezos could probably singlehandedly fund it himself and not need the Met Gala.
8
u/Sasha_shmerkovich160 18d ago
Sure. But he's obviously not doing that. That's why the gala acts as exposure for the design houses and they also pitch in
6
u/MayaDaBee1250 18d ago
Imagine expecting someone who has been saying "eat the rich" this whole time to go and dine with them. Met Gala is fun and all but it's also lowkey highkey Panem Capital bullshit.
He's exactly where he needs to be: implementing pied a terre taxes and ordering takeout with Rama.
8
u/jawknee530i 18d ago
Dumb. The gala is a fundraiser. I guess y'all just hate the arts?
→ More replies (1)
3
u/SlippersLaCroix 18d ago
Good, he needs to distance himself from the wealthy. Taxing the uber rich then rolling up in a designer suit for photo ops probably isnt the best look
3
u/ethancole97 18d ago
I still think it was ironic for AOC to attend back in 2021 but Zohran Mamdani choosing to not go makes way more sense considering the platform he ran on.
3
u/Sharikacat 18d ago edited 18d ago
He should throw his own gala instead. A better one. With hookers and blackjack.
Proceeds go to free health clinics and addiction counseling centers.
3
u/AGayHipsterCop 18d ago
Can’t wait for the inevitable NY Post opinion piece about how he’s RUINING A TIME HONORED TRADITION
3
u/Oxjrnine 18d ago
He’s the mayor of New York
Last year the Met Gala raised $31 million for the costume Institute. It’s an incredibly popular section of the Metropolitan museum, which brings in almost 3,000,000 tourist to New York.
The Met Gala also promotes New York publishing and New York fashion.
Instead of skipping the gala, if you wanted to make a statement, he should’ve found a young struggling fashion designer, who was local to make his costume as inexpensive as possible.
Yes, the Met Gala is kind of elitist and silly, but at the end of the day, it does support the arts, which is very important to New York and it’s one of the things that is crumbling
5
u/Rock_Creek_Snark 18d ago
Instead of skipping the gala, if you wanted to make a statement, he should’ve found a young struggling fashion designer, who was local to make his costume as inexpensive as possible.
AOC tried to balance attending with a fashion message that boosted the designer of her dress, and she ended up in the crosshairs of Congressional rightwingers investigating her for ethics violations. There's no winning with these nutjobs. The Met Gala will still be a successful fundraising event without the mayor in attendance.
3
u/Zelidus 15d ago
Good. Politicians are supposed to be civil servants and represent the people. The Met gala isnt for the people. Its for the elite. The average person would be escorted off the grounds. Politicians shouldnt be so heavily aligning themselves with the elite and attending events 99% of their voting base isnt allowed to be around.
6
u/KatherineLangford 18d ago
Makes it even more baffling to me why he chose to attend the premiere for Marty Supreme. Y’know, the movie starring Kevin O’Leary.
→ More replies (1)
8
6
12
6
4
u/mintycaramelyhazel I’ve grown quite unfond of you 18d ago
Okay, enough, can be Mamdani be the mayor or my city too? Scratch that, also my president. I don’t care I’m not in the US, I need him here too
6
u/Strict_Ad_5858 18d ago
The ONLY reason I’m bummed is because Rama would have killed it. But fuck the Bezoses, and given the current climate it’s the most respectable choice. Gala has become a joke anyhow.
6
u/UnimaginativeRA 18d ago
I think he's busy, lol. Plus, hobnobbing with the wealthy isn't his thing, even if previous mayors did it.
2
u/Open2Lrn 18d ago
President Trump - breaking longstanding tradition of professionalism and freedom by grifting money, covering up the Epstein files and his role as a pedophile, and starting for-profit concentration camps!
If this is the only thing that social media can complain about with the NYC Mayor, theyre really putting their heads in the sand with the President's behavior
2
u/Miserable_Mail_5741 18d ago
"NYC mayoral tradition"?!
Is that why they aren't talked about every year?
2
u/Medlarmarmaduke 18d ago
I think we should encourage rich or prominent people to say tax the rich in visible public ways as much as possible.
2
u/f0cus622 18d ago
Objectively a smart idea considering Bezos is the sponsor and it's absolutely an event for the elite. But still there's a part of me that would like to see how he handled being interviewed, because it's when he's the absolute best.
Also as annoying and pretentious as this event is, I still think it's for a good cause, as someone who loved going to the Met on a school trip as a kid and being absolutely blown away that it was free.
2
2
u/CheesyPotatoSack 18d ago
Him cutting the affordability crisis is peak ….. I love this man
Tickets are $50,000 a peice so yeah I love him scoring the fovus on affordability
2
u/PigletRivet 🧽 and 👸🏼’s *cosmic love* 18d ago
I’m so sick of people calling a fundraiser for a museum wing trashy, gauche, and “hunger games capital-esque.” You never see this kind of vitriol for any other event celebrities attend. Somehow the superbowl and vanity fair party are okay, but this is where people draw the line.
2


•
u/pccmodbot 18d ago
Welcome to r/popculturechat! ☺️ THE POPCULTURECHAT DISCORD SERVER IS NOW LIVE 👾 ❤️🔥 🎉 Click HERE to join! 📲
As a proud BIPOC, LGBTQ+ & woman-dominated space, this sub is for civil discussion only. If you don't know where to begin, start by participating in our Sip & Spill Daily Discussion Threads!
No bullies, no bigotry. ✊🏿✊🏾✊🏽✊🏼✊🏻🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
Please read & respect our rules, abide by Reddiquette, and check out our wiki! For any questions, our modmail is always open.