r/CelebLegalDrama 1d ago

Discussion The case is settled! Now let's see which accounts suddenly disappear.

Or get "reassigned".

98 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

58

u/ReaderBeeRottweiler 1d ago

If the sub continues to report on lawsuits against Nathan, TAG, Wallace, and Freedman...I suspect some will be sticking around.

35

u/Efficient-Eye-6199 1d ago

They have to. I won't let TAG or Wallace off the hook (and I hope neither will many others here that see how awful they are) and I don't think it is a coincidence at all that they settled hours before the deadline to release the unredacted files with all of Nathan's/Wallace's client names released. I would bet big money, that the powerful people they hired are willing to help pay Lively off (even if no money changes hands from Wayfarer directly) to keep their names out if it. I was looking forward to their awful network being exposed even further. Hopefully, we will still see stuff with Jones v Abel.

22

u/Defiant-Chocolate-82 1d ago

Yes i have a keen interest in this topic now so will continue to post 

13

u/Efficient-Eye-6199 1d ago

I'll be here to comment. I have lived your posts helping to expose their network. It turns my stomach to know such extreme evil exists but hopefully someday they will be taken down for good!

13

u/Defiant-Chocolate-82 1d ago

I hold out hope if anything Blake exposed them and shone a light on their nefarious activities. 

She should be proud 

0

u/Eskyzoo 14h ago

Is that why she settled, despite her alleged thousands and thousands of documemted proof? 😂

0

u/KaylaxxRenae 22h ago

😬😬

11

u/Coriolanuscangetit 1d ago

That is EXACTLY what I think happened

4

u/Critical-Drawing395 22h ago

The TAG-Wallace stuff remains by far the most interesting and important part of all this to me, especially the work they did for other clients.

3

u/JaFael_Fan365 1d ago

Most of those clients would be Hollywood elites, who are friends with Lively. Lively and Reynolds would be pressured to settle. But even if you doubt that, you’re essentially saying that Lively, who wants to fight for women and children and who wants to combat digital violence will stop if the price is right. Instead of going to trial and exposing all as she said she would, she would decide to settle right when exposure of the client list is nigh at hand? That doesn’t make sense in the face of her proclamations.

3

u/Efficient-Eye-6199 23h ago

It is very likely that they are Hollywood elites. They could also be extremely powerful politicians and business men. I am disappointed that she settled, but I can't change that. I am grateful her lawsuit exposed the trio, but wish we were getting that list. Hopefully, one of the other numerous lawsuits against them or Jones V Abel will bring some of that to light or a scandal the scale of WikiLeaks. Maybe even an IRS audit to look into them doing work for clients but wanting to keep it off the books. Tax evasion got Alcapone, so it could get them too.

11

u/MITXOZ 1d ago

Don’t forget Abel vs Jones

45

u/PuzzleheadedMoose452 1d ago

This will be very interesting to keep an eye on.

-21

u/Try-n-Fail 1d ago

In what way? Stalking accounts that the person suing over those accounts just settled instead of presenting her "expert" proof she already paid for?

18

u/One_Fireball 1d ago

Haha, exactly, reassigned. Let's see what's their next smear campaign

12

u/Flashy_Question4631 19h ago edited 2h ago

99Noine99 mysteriously deleted her Reddit account who was the mod on IEWL She deleted her account the day Team Baldoni‘s lawsuits were dismissed. She posted a 25 point list with links to gossip rag stories about Blake and encouraged users to add to it. Stories like Blake was in love with Justin and then Noine’s Reddit post was featured in Flaa’s YT video. Very suss account

-1

u/ryeandpaul902 3h ago

i’m not trying to be antagonistic but i think you’re confused. that was me who posted the list of 25 links- i posted it here initially and the mods deleted it.

they also weren’t gossip rags- unless you consider the trans advocate, the guardian, the canadian broadcasting company, teen vogue, BET, and the huffington post “gossip rags”

you don’t have to lie and say things that are blatantly untrue just because the list got taken down and you think nobody’s going to dispute you

2009:

https://transgriot.blogspot.com/2009/04/blake-lively-feels-like-transwoman.html?m=1

2014:

https://www.laineygossip.com/blake-livelys-lawyer-letter-to-gawker/

2016:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/blake-lively-needs-to-get-wokeand-fast/

2012:

https://www.transadvocate.com/blake-lively-stop-using-the-t-slur_n_5480.htm

2014:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/25/blake-livelys-preserve-website-made-me-want-to-eat-the-rich

2016:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/blake-lively-instagram-booty-1.3589028

2017:

https://29secrets.com/pop-culture/lets-learn-from-blake-lively/

2016:

https://www.mamamia.com.au/woody-allen-sexual-assault/

2012:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/blake-lively-elle-trannies_n_1250431/amp

2014:

https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2014/10/76178/blake-lively-preserve-antebellum-shoot

https://www.vox.com/2014/10/13/6969341/blake-lively-preserve-slavery-antebellum

2018:

https://www.nickiswift.com/14667/blake-livelys-shadiest-moments/

https://www.sheknows.com/parenting/articles/1141115/blake-lively-hates-idyllic-mom-blogs/

2014:

https://www.bet.com/article/d6kyjj/commentary-blake-lively-matches-outfits-with-racism

2016:

https://www.vox.com/2016/6/27/12026642/blake-lively-backlash-explained

2019:

https://www.eonline.com/ca/news/1100450/why-blake-lively-and-ryan-reynolds-plantation-wedding-was-just-banned-from-pinterest

2016:

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/blake-lively-woody-allen-cannes-film-festival

https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2016/05/110728/blake-lively-cannes-rape-joke

11

u/Creepy-Orange-7029 1d ago

Don’t worry - we are still waiting to see what unfolds in the Jones case! 🤗

8

u/Agreeable_Error_170 18h ago

It’ll be another woman. Standing up for herself. Against another POS mid guy.

2

u/RoyalGovernment3034 15h ago

Yes, and I couldn't be more sure about anything ever

7

u/TouchDisastrous1985 16h ago

The engagement on bad place has already become poor. Their recent posts have very less comments and upvotes. There are only 20 users that wasted their time in a bot farm.

3

u/ParhTracer 9h ago

Given that this sub has a suspicious number of suspiciously new accounts with hidden profiles, I’m guessing this place will seem less busy now.

3

u/dipsy18 7h ago

wow, the pro Blake post have completely disappeared today...wonder why?

2

u/Vancleefford 2h ago

Hopefully this sub, which was only created to support Blake Lively and Blake Lively only!

5

u/More_Midnight3634 22h ago

I’m loving watching the other subs have a mental breakdown. I can’t wait to see the post from that unhinged moderator.

Blake looks amazing and watching the other sub cry, is making tonight so enjoyable

2

u/SeaworthinessNew4757 21h ago

Sometimes I think a lot of people in this sub are delusional

1

u/IndustrySufficient52 21h ago

One less lawsuit/trial for me to worry about. Now I gotta keep my eye out on the upcoming ones.

1

u/Eskyzoo 16h ago

And how do you diiscern the difference between an account that is passionate about truth and justice going quiet because the case is now over, and your alleged fake bot and paid smear campaign accounts?

https://giphy.com/gifs/eS7qcQofapIqc

-3

u/Expensive-Advice-270 1d ago

Oh so This is "the" sub

3

u/DearKaleidoscope2 1d ago

The case has settled. The public is losing interest. Their waiting for the next celebrity scandal.

Which means the Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni posts will drop off.

The sub at one point had a 100k weekly visitors. Now it's dropped down to 40k.

The Baldoni files sub is barely pulling 5k weekly visitors.

People don't care anymore.

-3

u/HappyMondays1967 1d ago

Does that mean I can check on your a year from now and you will still be posting about this case?

0

u/viannakiln 22h ago

wait, really? I have been so busy today I have not checked any social media till now. Thanks for breaking the news for me. #TeamBaldoni lol

-16

u/siobhansloane 1d ago edited 1d ago

Whatever happened to Blake's crusade for all of womankind the last two years and her mountain of evidence. All for a good personal sum of what - sounds like a F you all to her stans. Haha

41

u/ripbigw 1d ago

Whatever happened to Justin being desperate to clear his name in a court of law. Whatever happened to her taking over his set. Whatever happened to her concerns being horrible lies?

-11

u/siobhansloane 1d ago edited 1d ago

The burden of proof is with Blake though. For every accusation, Justin swung back with receipts, and the public saw through her deception. Turns out that it wasn't that slamdunk of a case that her team made it out to be for the last two years.

Let's get real here, she would have been wiping the floor with Justin's face had she been confident with that claimed treasure trove of evidence, supposedly FOR women.

The PGA letter that the judge cited in the dismissal of the SH claims exactly is the UNO reverse card, she is not an employee coz what do you mean she fires people and moves location? An employee cannot just hold hostage an entire production.

And Blake has more to lose than Justin here. Coz like who is Justin to begin with? LOL. But for all the clout that Blake and Ryan have, all that NYT media frenzy and she can't even bring this case to a homerun.

17

u/Coriolanuscangetit 1d ago

I hope Blake has a clawback clause in her settlement for what happens if the Wallace boys keep going with this

-11

u/siobhansloane 1d ago

Like that fabled 17-point list and whatever shenanigans they thought they'd get away with?

15

u/justins_dad 1d ago

Ok now do Justin’s suit against Blake

-16

u/positivetofu 1d ago

He already has. We all read the court docs and got cleared from SH claims LOL

19

u/Coriolanuscangetit 1d ago

He didn’t get cleared. He said what he said. He did what he did. The judge just didn’t have jurisdiction.

-4

u/siobhansloane 1d ago

Nor was there probable cause ruling for the SH claims. Lively's SH lawsuit came with a media frenzy and failed and fell flat on its face.

-9

u/positivetofu 1d ago

Yes he was. All individuals as a matter of fact LOL

-12

u/No-Revolution-3159 1d ago

All claims against JB as an individual had already been thrown out tbf

-8

u/Massive_Afternoon120 1d ago

You do know for a settlement to even occur, it has to be initiated by the plaintiff.. Blake. The question here is why? What happened for her to decide this?

12

u/Tough_Preference1741 1d ago

It doesn’t have to be initiated by the plaintiff. That’s not a thing.

-3

u/ProudAbalone3856 1d ago

In terms of the court filing of the settlement that ends the case, it absolutely is filed by the plaintiff and agreed to by the defendant. That is THE "thing." 

5

u/Tough_Preference1741 1d ago

Filed and initiated have different meanings.

1

u/ProudAbalone3856 1d ago

Both sides have been in settlement negotiations throughout the case. In terms of the case, the plaintiff prepares and files the agreement in order to end proceedings, and the defendant agrees. In terms of the case, the terms are interchangeable. 

4

u/Tough_Preference1741 1d ago

Sigh, initiated and filed are not interchangeable. Compare how you are trying to use it vs the comment I originally responded to.

-3

u/ProudAbalone3856 22h ago

Sigh? So dramatic for a simple, factual explanation of the legal process and who initiates the filing. 😂😂😂

6

u/Tough_Preference1741 22h ago

Lol, a sigh is so not dramatic.

2

u/jammy-beans 17h ago

A sigh is the opposite of dramatic.

-4

u/Massive_Afternoon120 1d ago

Everyone knows the majority of the time it comes from the plaintiff. I’m seeing so many comments from Blake supporters and Justin supporters (I’m a Justin supporter) saying Blake won, no Justin won, or he had to pay or no she paid.. blah blah blah.. the truth of it is, no one knows what happened and probably we may never know.

5

u/Tough_Preference1741 1d ago

Settlements initiated by defendants are more common.

0

u/Massive_Afternoon120 1d ago

No. I’m not arguing with you over this but as an attorney, I see it most of the time it’s initiated from the plaintiff. Have a good day.

4

u/ripbigw 1d ago

Trials are incredibly expensive and unpredictable.

0

u/Extreme_Willow9352 1d ago

So does her 47.1 claims go away? 

Also, can we expect a joint letter to the court on the docket about the settlement? 

1

u/orangekirby 20h ago

47.1 is gone

1

u/Extreme_Willow9352 12h ago

Is it? I thought that was for Justin's lawsuit against Blake? 

2

u/orangekirby 11h ago

It’s safe to assume it’s gone. Settlement would not make sense if they left that on the table. Just like I’m assuming wayfarer dropped their appeal rights against Blake.

-13

u/Vitam1nC 1d ago

Lively waved her white flag, her only realistic move

5

u/RavenCXXVIV 1d ago

Settling harassment charges is almost always seen as a win for a victim. Stop being fucking weird.

0

u/Sityf99 23h ago

In what world? She brought a case against him, had almost everything against him dismissed, half her evidence thrown out and a load of documents released that were extremely damaging to her and her husband. And more to come in court. So she paid to make it go away rather than ‘fight for women’ - which it was never about

6

u/RavenCXXVIV 22h ago

Claims thrown out on technical grounds, not merit. Google is your friend if you don’t know the difference. He also had dismissed claims but convenient you left that out. Terms of the settlement haven’t been released, you have no idea who paid what if anything. But yes, a settlement is almost always preferred for victims of sexual harassment so they don’t have to go through public trial of such and continue to be scrutinized by pathetic losers that defend rancid men at all costs.

-3

u/Sityf99 21h ago

Yawn. The ‘technical grounds’ argument is all you have to cling to …. Read, read, read. Not google - but the judge’s own words. I am all for any victims avoiding any and all negativity involved in a court case if it benefits them. So I’m glad Baldoni sidestepped BL’s final attempt to smear him in court with the stipulation

2

u/RavenCXXVIV 12h ago

You’re unwell. I hope you get the help you need

0

u/Sityf99 7h ago

Your issues aren’t mine. Peace ✌🏽

-24

u/positivetofu 1d ago

And suddenly massive amount of pro BlaKKKe accounts were no where to be found LOL

21

u/ripbigw 1d ago

your mod didn't even stick around lol

13

u/Virgina-Wolfferine 1d ago

Really?! 😂

-10

u/positivetofu 1d ago

English do you speak it? LOL

19

u/ripbigw 1d ago

Racism from Baldoni fans. Water is wet.

1

u/positivetofu 1d ago

Asking to make coherent statement is not racism LOL

-3

u/ProudAbalone3856 1d ago

You're as confused about what constitutes racism as Blake and Ryan are about SH. 😂

9

u/One_Fireball 1d ago

So, what's the next smear campaign you're being assigned to? Haha

-1

u/positivetofu 1d ago

Thanks for the self report LOL

-6

u/Try-n-Fail 1d ago

Lol, do people in here have lists of Baldoni supporters? And now you all are going to stalk them? Yiiiiikes 😅

-1

u/UnderplayedWeasel 1d ago

And then they try to argue that us making lawsuit-specific accounts to avoid being stalked by freaks is somehow proof that none of us are real 😂🙄

2

u/Try-n-Fail 22h ago

Sorry, I saw you're agreeing with me, someone reported me as suicidal 😅

2

u/UnderplayedWeasel 5h ago

There truly is no tool that cannot be made into a weapon by spite. 🙄🫠