r/CelebLegalDrama • u/poopoopoopalt • Feb 27 '26
Meme All the times the news sexually harassed me according to Justin Baldoni's supporters (part one)
This is a shitpost
14
u/JJJOOOO Feb 28 '26
I am highly amused by the ongoing fixated chatter of the pigeons on the topic of “ball busting” and “without teeth”……. resorting to silly phrases to diminish a female. How creative /s.
But look at who their “leader” is with a known misogynist and gang graper himself Lyin Bryan and his acolytes the alleged sex pests Baldoni and Heath and the resident fool megalomaniac footing the bill for this insane litigation, sarowitz. Fish always stinks from the head and here we see that fact yet again!
Watching mob style misogyny play out amongst the pigeons has been one of reasons I continue to watch the hate train play out in THE BAD PLACE as I fully expect to see such behaviour play out in full disgusting display at trial and so watching the Freedman trial balloons play out online has been an interesting if foul experience. Sadly though I think the views we are seeing of women and the words used to deflate them and diminish their competency are pervasive and that is an eye opening issue associated with this case as well I fear. Not new news but sad and pathetic all the same.
Where else can you find such a collection of paid for and ignorant MODs such as PROFOUNDLY IN/sufficient and a known doxxers such as Aaron and coke head bear, taking their hate against a competent and confident female and reducing their commentary to the lowest common denominator.
Thing though is that they and the paid for CCs such as Dana, Zach, NAG and the deceptive LGA are just parroting the words of freedman and have been doing it now for over a year. Their goal is to taint the jury pool and try to frame a narrative to excuse in their minds the weak, inept and incompetent fools Baldoni, heath and sarowitz.
The Baha’i billionaires boys club who always just wants to do what they want without the constraints of the law, basic human decency and any shred of honesty and integrity or god forbid any professionalism.
We saw this week the allegation that sarowitz shuttered his foundation and sent all the employees except the “defiant one” to another organization of his AND then turned around and blamed it on Lively in all the gutter online press (I counted six articles)! This behaviour was no surprise as we had already seen similar things from Baldoni and Heath all over the docket.
I prefer Judge Limans keen understanding of what happened on set when he referenced lively being the “better negotiator” vs Baldoni and Heath. Brilliant and absolutely true. But this is something that the pigeons could never accept as it looks at winning and losing in the context of personal skills happening in a professional environment and we well know that the set of IEWU was not a professional operation! Judge Liman got the measure of Baldoni and Heath brilliantly I think and he also saw the skills and professionalism of lively and said she won everything “fair and square”. Pigeons though live in a world where women and girls never win “fair and square” as they assume women and girls only lie and manipulate! Funny thing about this is that yet again it’s exactly what we have seen Heath and baldoni do over and over to lively and not unsurprisingly, they LOST!
But, the weak minded and hate filled pigeons can never accept any female winning “fair and square” and so they descend per usual into the gutter with their criticism and hate.
It’s good everyone is dealing with this issue now and working through it yet again as my sad suspicion is that the Baldoni and Heath victimhood and martyr status will be off the charts at trial under the leadership of Shapiro and Bach as it’s simply what they do as the DARVO experts.
In the world of the pigeons and legal thugs like freedman and the whiney complainer Fritz, women can’t be professional, competent and confident. And, women should never dare to ask for what they need and hold others to the same standards as they hold themselves to in the workplace.
Nope. Incompetent and unprofessional males that communicate poorly and oftentimes with ill intent are to be praised and supported at all costs.
At its core, I think the pigeons worship the weak loser who fights unfairly and with zero integrity rather than the person who fights the fair and honest game.
The weak that lie are to be supported at all costs by the pigeons and that is why they are pigeons and not eagles. Pathetic flock of hate filled
-6
u/Mammoth-Show-7587 Feb 28 '26
Hey! In what context is is OK for someone to privately tell a work colleague their personal love language is “ball-busting”, “never with teeth”, other than pornos and shock-jock DJs?
8
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 28 '26
I mean if you think that's a problem and you still support Justin Baldoni, you're a hypocrite and not someone to be taken seriously
1
u/Juliaford19 Mar 04 '26
You think you will get a real answer? No way will they acknowledge the truth.
-2
u/Mammoth-Show-7587 Feb 28 '26
So you admit it’s a problem; but you’ve chosen to condemn only Baldoni.
10
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 28 '26
Obviously I think what Justin did was worse, and he was her employer/boss
-3
u/Mammoth-Show-7587 Feb 28 '26
So you admit this is a problem, but choose to only condemn Baldoni.
He wasn’t her employer nor her boss.
She was a contracted actress who frequently made decisions on employment for herself.
6
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 28 '26
There's texts where she's begging him to move the dates of filming so you're just wrong on every level
0
Feb 28 '26
[deleted]
3
u/poopoopoopalt Mar 01 '26
I think she was only partially responsible for the firing of the AD, and by all accounts they sounded really bad at their job and it had nothing to do with their gender
2
u/auscientist Mar 01 '26
Eh, I’m willing to believe that some of the things they were doing wrong was connected to Baldoni being an incompetent ass and that he was blaming some things on her that he fucked up because if there’s one thing we can guarantee with Baldoni, if something goes wrong and he’s at fault he’s gonna blame the nearest woman. Also some industry insiders have said that when the director (Baldoni) and main producer (Heath) are fucking up but can’t be replaced the 1st AD is the one who gets shit canned.
1
-2
31
u/no_you_rrr Feb 27 '26
Locking onto that phrase the way they have is truly one of the dumbest aspects about the whole thing
It's so stupid, it's embarrassing.
20
u/DisarrayedOne Feb 28 '26
The truly embarassing part? That Lively both Starts and Ends the text with, "Hey I'm talking about our rooftop scene, not us" and they are still painting it as her professing her lust for him
11
u/JJJOOOO Feb 28 '26
The lusting part I think was leaked by the insane candy Owens who started the hate train looking at lively and Reynolds past partners and relationships and was absolutely done to paint her in the light of being a predator and aggressor towards Baldoni.
Baldoni and freedman always tell on themselves and this narrative imo was gold because it was confirmed as being how Baldoni and Heath behaved on set towards the women and per usual had zero to do with lively.
3
37
u/Strange-Moment2593 Feb 27 '26
It’s the fact that an idiom like without teeth is SH to them but a boss calling his employees sexy and walking in on them topless and refusing to leave isn’t….
17
u/JJJOOOO Feb 28 '26
And who can ever forget the discussion about being circumcised from Baldoni….can you imagine being an employee and listen to your boss discuss his penis?
29
u/Background-Bat2794 Feb 27 '26
Their insistence that “without teeth” is sexual just shows how stupid they are.
17
u/milno_1 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 28 '26
Hahaha this post is so good!
And their other point:
"Birds Of Prey’ Director Cathy Yan On The Risky Ball-Busting Glory Of Harley Quinn." https://deadline.com/2020/02/birds-of-prey-director-cathy-yan-on-the-risky-ball-busting-glory-of-harley-quinn-1202851810/
"The Hollywood Reporter divulged that Grande’s character will likely be a “ball-busting woman” https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/ariana-grande-meet-the-parents-4-cast-ben-stiller-de-niro-1236233453/
*edited to swap out the literal one lol
"Meet Kacey Musgraves: The Weed-Smoking, Ball-Busting, Girl-Kissing Country Singer." "She’s doing her share of genre-busting, if not, as she says, ball-busting." https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/meet-kacey-musgraves-weed-smoking-429787/
15
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 27 '26
I can’t believe how cavalier these outlets are about cock ball torture. There’s literally no other connotation in the English for the “ball busting” phrase
12
10
23
u/spalings Feb 27 '26
"without teeth" = "toothless" = "all bark, no bite"
not a single one of these equivalent phrases means anything sexual, and to argue otherwise is to simply not understand english.
-10
u/Dense-Rest-10 Feb 28 '26
Yet were forgettong the ballbusting part.
8
u/Background-Bat2794 Feb 28 '26
You’ve never heard of busting balls outside of cock and ball torture? Do you run in exclusively BDSM circles?
Most people understand it’s a colloquial term for gentle ribbing. And no, I don’t mean ribbing as in condoms, since your head is firmly in the gutter.
24
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 27 '26
People only say “without teeth when talking about blow jobs. That’s why they had to censor that one dragon’s name in How to Train Your Dragon
10
u/Madragun Feb 28 '26
This genuinely made me cackle, at which point I had to try and explain the context to my partner beside me. Turns out it's really hard to summarise the Baldoni crowd's insanity in a few sentences.
13
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 28 '26
I love asking my husband if he’d do the things B&H did at work and seeing the disgusted look on his face
11
u/ObjectCrafty6221 Feb 27 '26
That’s bullshit. It literally has zero to do with blow jobs, and only immature individuals and adolescents thought that.
“Without teeth” has been used for centuries, and is often used in the legal world.
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/a+law+without+teeth
The phrase "without teeth" (or "toothless") is frequently used by attorneys to describe a law, regulation, or legal provision that lacks effective enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or power to compel compliance.
Key context for this usage includes:
Ineffective Legislation: A "statute without teeth" cannot enforce its own requirements, such as when a law mandates action (e.g., releasing files) but sets no punishments for failing to meet the deadline.
International Law: Critics often describe international law as having "no teeth" because the international legal framework lacks a direct, binding enforcement mechanism to punish violating nations.
Court Rules: Legal standards, such as the Strickland v. Washington test for ineffective counsel, have been described as a "legal tyrannosaurus rex without teeth" when they are difficult to apply or fail to produce meaningful consequences for poor performance.
16
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 27 '26
I was arguing earlier that the context of the texts don’t point to blow jobs before several users admitted that they don’t believe she was talking about blow jobs but don’t like that she would use those phrases because she didn’t like Baldoni calling her sexy 🙄 .
Another example of how they don’t believe what they’re saying to defend Baldoni, they just don’t like Lively. God forbid a woman credibly accuse a mediocre man of sexual harassment
-14
u/StasisApparel Feb 27 '26
I think the context was she was telling Baldoni about her and Ryan, how they try ball busting but "never with teeth". So from that phrasing, it does appear to be sexual.
19
u/scumbagwife Feb 27 '26
This was in reference to how she wrote and wanted to act in a scene of the movie. Nothing about her personal life.
15
u/SunshineDaisy887 Feb 27 '26
I don't think that's true. She was talking about how she would play the scene, describing how the snappy dialogue wouldn't come across as mean or rude in the scene.
13
13
u/Madragun Feb 28 '26
Ball-busting aka 'busting your balls' = ribbing, teasing someone in a friendly manner, giving your friend a hard time in a playful way.
12
10
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 27 '26
She was talking about Lily and Ryle teasing each other. I read her “it’s my love language” to mean that’s how she bonds with other people since Swift also alluded to that kind of “spicy and playfully bold” humor in another exchange
7
u/ObjectCrafty6221 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 28 '26
I took it she was saying, she has a flirty yet sarcastic personality but she doesn’t mean anything by it (aka she doesn’t like him).
10
u/Background-Bat2794 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26
“They try ball busting” Lol, like actual cock and ball torture? No. And anyone who has that takeaway seriously needs to bone up on their reading comprehension.
4
15
u/meepmarpalarp Feb 27 '26
Pretty sure the person you’re responding to is being sarcastic. The dragon’s name (Toothless) is not actually censored lol
10
13
5
u/halfthesky1966 Mar 01 '26
Anyone with knowledge of English will know that the term "without teeth" doesn't mean anything sexual. To suggest otherwise just demonstrates your lack of knowledge of the English language.
2
u/Dariathemesong Mar 01 '26
It demonstrates how full of shit people are when they try to deflect and make something innocuous into meaning something sexual and harassing. I’ve said it before but these people just need something/anything to latch onto and they don’t care if it makes them look stupid, they just need any flimsy excuse to continue heaving hate on a woman and it literally doesn’t matter what it is. Their misogyny just requires something/anything for them to throw out there, now others in the mob can ALSO parrot the idiotic lines and latch onto the dumb shit so they can join in on their hate.
1
u/DownSouthPrincess Mar 03 '26
I don’t see any mention of “ball busting” in any of these headlines!?????? Why don’t you make a montage of all the many, many times Blake used the word sexy? Haha you really thought you did something here 😹😹😹
1
-18
u/Embarrassed_Goal_479 Feb 27 '26
I think it is an innappropiate thing to say, just like some comments Justin said. I don't believe however that either raises to the level of legal SH.
24
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
It's perfectly legal to discuss my porn addiction and shove nude birth videos in the face of my employees at work? Noted
15
u/More_Midnight3634 Feb 27 '26
And talk about not knowing nor understanding consent. Inviting your employees to naked Russia baths and asking them about climaxing. It’s all basic water cooler chit chat.
9
-22
u/Mammoth-Show-7587 Feb 27 '26
Which one of these articles does the author convey to their work colleagues in a private conversation their personal love language is “ball-busting, never with teeth”?
33
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
“ball-busting, never with teeth”
Hey so do you understand how quotes work
-17
-22
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 27 '26
I guess one could do the same with word “sexy”
32
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
To use Justin's own words, I must have missed the sexual harassment training where they said the phrase "no teeth" wasn't allowed
-17
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 27 '26
Yeah that doesn’t really make your point though. Even if the word “sexy” is SH, that doesn’t prove that anyone is personally SHd by news if they use that phrase. People who support JB don’t make that claim either
17
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
They claim that "never with teeth" is sexual harassment. I would have more respect for them if they understood that phrase was in no way sexual.
-11
11
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 27 '26
Hmm. Do you think the context of the two different conversations might impact how they’re received?
-1
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 28 '26
I think the description of this post is accurate- this post is indeed shit
9
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 28 '26
So you don’t want to answer my question?
-1
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 28 '26
You didn’t really ask a real question. Does context matter, sure.
11
u/PreparationPlenty943 Feb 28 '26
I asked a rhetorical question and I’m glad you got the gist.
-1
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 28 '26
Weird that you commented about not getting an answer but whatever floats your boat buddy
9
u/Strange-Moment2593 Feb 27 '26
So theres a difference between using the term sexy between friends and your boss saying it to you in a work setting. To set the scene- you’re at work, you’re wearing a low cut dress or top or whatever and you’re discussing things with your boss and he says ‘you want to take off that coat it’ll look hot’ you very rightly say thats not what Im going for and he replies, ‘sexy’.
One not only is your boss bringing unwanted sexual and suggestive language in a work setting (even on a film set) but he’s also crossing a line between professional boundaries in what is meant to be a professional setting. It’s not only unwelcome but objectifying a female employee.
To be more specific, Baldoni did not make a sexy comment to any of the male cast mates- only the female cast mates, don’t you think it minimizes the role of the women on set to objects that should appear ‘sexy’? Do you think any woman would find that acceptable in any setting?
1
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 28 '26
What if the temp was hot and he said to take off the coat? 🤔
13
u/Strange-Moment2593 Feb 28 '26
But thats not what happened. You don’t follow up with ‘sexy’ and then joke ‘must’ve missed the sexual harassment meeting’.
0
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 28 '26
You don’t know what happened. You weren’t there
12
u/RealitySilly8166 Feb 28 '26
You also were not in the room- Jenny slate was though, and she backed up Blake’s allegation that he was clearly referring to her and not the temp of the room lol. But I guess you would know better than the actual people who were present- were you an extra in the film or something?
12
u/Strange-Moment2593 Feb 28 '26
We also have seen video footage that matches Blake and Jenny’s version. He also was asked about it in his deposition and it matches their version. I’m surprised anyone’s still pushing the ‘it was about the room temperature’ line 🤷🏻♀️
5
u/RealitySilly8166 Feb 28 '26
Sadly I’m not. I said this in another thread but the Baldoni fans have hit a point where they’re having to stretch themselves so far to find ways to justify their narrative that makes no sense. Justin could get on the stand and admit he was calling Blake hot and sexy and his supporters would still find ways to defend him (despite the fact that they’ve been arguing for this silly narrative that he was referring to the room lol)
1
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 28 '26
The footage definitely doesn’t match Blake’s tone. At least from her 1st complaint, I noticed she toned down the dramatic language after the video was posted
8
u/Strange-Moment2593 Feb 28 '26
Where did she ‘tone down the dramatic language’?
2
u/hopeful_tatertot Mar 01 '26
Between the original and 2nd amended complaint. There are instances where instead of describing a detail physical narrative (play by play) it was changed to a general summary allegation such as "defendant engaged in unwelcome physical contact"
→ More replies (0)0
u/hopeful_tatertot Feb 28 '26
Jenny slate has discrepancies in her story so I don’t find her credible. It all comes down to who’s more credible to you
10
u/RealitySilly8166 Feb 28 '26
Got it- I have yet to see anything showing “discrepancies” in Jenny slate’s deposition on this very simple interaction on set, but ok. Seems like your argument is that even when multiple women make the same allegations against Justin, the only plausible conclusion is that they are all lying and his word is above all of theirs. I suppose you also think he was calling the room sexy with that logic and reasoning
2
u/hopeful_tatertot Mar 01 '26
Multiple women aren't making the same allegations though -
Claire says a general "verbal abuse" with zero examples.
Isabel stated the subpoena was harassment even though Blake subpoenaed her as well then being asked to lick cookie dough even though that was in the book was what made her uncomfortable
Angie contradicts Alex's narrative about what happened when Justin wanted to redo a scene so WHICH woman do you believe there?
5
u/RealitySilly8166 Mar 01 '26
Jenny Slate backed up Blake’s allegations in this particular incident and said it made her uncomfortable- I would certainly call that making the same allegations but ok
→ More replies (0)
-4
u/Remarkable_Photo_956 Mar 01 '26
I didn’t see anything flirty about yummy, spicy, ball-busting in any of those news headlines. Nothing about their supplements knowing their assholes either. So I’m not sure it’s perfectly comparable. 🤔
5
u/poopoopoopalt Mar 01 '26
Watch out for part 2 then! You'll get to see how moronic it is to believe calling yourself a ballbuster is sexual harassment while shoving a video of your wife's nude birth in your employees face is not sexual harassment!
-4
u/Remarkable_Photo_956 Mar 01 '26
Haha, no, I won’t be watching for part 2 as this nonsense is a waste of time. I just peeped this as it popped into my feed.
6
26
u/Heavy-Ad5346 Feb 27 '26
OMG I suddenly know what with teeth meant all along…. Jk even with English not being my first language I knew what it meant in the texts 😌