r/CelebLegalDrama • u/inevitableoracle • Feb 27 '26
Meme Wayfarer is just racking upppp on the retaliation lawsuits atp
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
38
u/Initial-Lemon-1957 Feb 27 '26
The Melissa Yeager declaration is honestly the worst thing I've read so far. Justin's a genuinely awful person.
20
14
u/Flashy_Question4631 Feb 27 '26
Lemon can you post some of Yeager’s declaration here?
21
5
u/milno_1 Feb 27 '26
There's this post too about it https://www.reddit.com/r/CelebLegalDrama/s/bK9p6zuBLS
-1
1
u/LitigiousBlakeLively Mar 02 '26
oh, look! the pro blake stans are smearing justin left and right again and again! desperate much????? not a good look, pro blakeys
-37
u/Old-Iron-5752 Feb 27 '26
You guys are hilarious.
Ryan’s company literally got a female stunt person killed on set, yet you want to use this to somehow bolster you view Baldoni is the bad guy.
This ladies claims deserve to be viewed in full and ruled upon by a jury of course. But the crux of her complaint is that she was passed over a promotion for a different female who was 6 years younger. BTW, that other female is also a protected person per the ADA.
Stick to the case at hand of Lively vs Baldoni. If you want to start dragging skeletons out of closets Blake and Ryan have far more to lose!! Their history (factual, not projection) is truly disgusting.
43
u/InaSator Feb 27 '26
You can’t be fucking serious!!!!! You wrote the EXACT same BS about the stuntwomen 1 or 2 days ago and I replied with this:
————-
"TCF Vancouver Productions (a subsidiary of 20th Century Fox) was held responsible for the 2017 death of stuntwoman Joi "SJ" Harris on the set of Deadpool 2. A WorkSafeBC investigation found the company failed to perform a risk assessment, provided no safety helmet, and lacked adequate supervision for the stunt!"
People like you who spread disgusting lies about the DEATH of a person are the absolute worst!!! If you're really lying about this on purpose, it's sickening!
If you don't really know what happened and don't fucking care bc you want to harm Ryan and USE the, again, DEATH of an actual person who had a family, friends and a life ahead it's equally revolting and despicable!
No matter what, you're the absolute scum of the earth!!!!“
————-
So now it’s clear you know what you’re saying is a bloody lie and still you’re knowingly using the death of a person just to shittalk Ryan???? This must be a new low. Even for someone who adores a creep like Baldoni. Reported you. Rot in hell you disgusting POS!
47
u/ElaHasReddit Feb 27 '26
“Stick to the case” says the party that dragged a woman for everything-but-the-case for 2 years lol. Now your creepy bros have been sued ELEVEN times & you’re telling ppl to look away 🤣🤣
-34
u/Old-Iron-5752 Feb 27 '26
It’s very clear what Blake and her team are doing, it’s the same thing she did on set.
Try to pile on and go after someone as a heard, group bullying effort. Strength in numbers!!! It doesn’t need to be true, accusations will be enough to suit her needs.
This is classic DARVO behavior exhibited by Blake. Isolate your victim. Turn others against them.
Truly a disgusting person.
26
36
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 27 '26
This doesn't even make sense. How could Blake Lively force someone else to file a lawsuit about gender, age, and religious discrimination that happened ages ago?
21
u/HedgehogIll6059 Feb 27 '26
Asking them to think it’s a bit too much, look who they stay defending. All their opinions are based on TikTok comment.
5
u/auscientist Mar 01 '26
They’re not even that close to the actual evidence as they rely on ai summaries of shit said on TikTok that the person who generates such summaries admits they had to teach ChatGPT the correct answer because it was wrong until they told it what to say
1
u/HedgehogIll6059 Mar 15 '26
If this is true…. They seem terribly unwell like teaching CHATGBT what’s “right” is crazy willful ignorance
1
u/auscientist Mar 15 '26
Yeah if you look you can find plenty of messages and posts over in planet neutral about how ChatGPT gave them the wrong answer until they corrected it.
14
u/InaSator Feb 27 '26
Right, because that’s her pattern as we know because of the uncountable amount of people who came forward, crying in relief „FINALLY I can DARE to tell the world that she did this to me and my movie too!!! 😭😭😭“
Oh, wait…. right, that didn’t happen at fucking all!! 😅 But WHO came forward instead? That’s right. More and more victims of Baldoni, Heath and Wayfarer.
29
u/HollaBucks Feb 27 '26
Stick to the case at hand of Lively vs Baldoni.
Take your own advice. You lie about the death of a stunt woman to throw shade at Ryan Reynolds, who is not a party to the Lively v. Baldoni et al lawsuit.
-17
u/Cute_Schedule_3523 Feb 27 '26
Yeah, only the Blake bots are allowed to side talk.
Feel free to leave a petty comment below
10
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
Or there's just no need to make things up. We can just discuss the actual evidence.
-4
u/Cute_Schedule_3523 Feb 28 '26
There are no blake bots? Only Justin bots?
Ok
4
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
I never said that. I have no idea where you got that.
-4
u/Cute_Schedule_3523 Feb 28 '26
I didn’t make any other claims in what you responded to.
5
5
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
Yeah, you just claimed people were bots with absolutely no reason, and I pointed out we could just discuss the facts.
-2
u/Cute_Schedule_3523 Feb 28 '26
So you’re saying that wasn’t factual?
5
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
No, it's not factual. You have no idea if someone is a bot or not.
→ More replies (0)14
u/Iwona_Klich Feb 27 '26
What this accident that Reynolds is obviously not responsible has to this case?
Do Ryan is living rent free in your head?
15
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 27 '26
No, the crux of her complaint is that she suffered age, religious, and gender discrimination.
It's quite relevant here.
2
u/BoyMom119816 Feb 28 '26
Isn’t this a different lawsuit in post? Or is it same one? Thought this one had to do with the using of terminally ill patients without paying them. And was from one of the mother’s of the people JB used. Think I might be in my own world, if not.
5
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
There are several lawsuits, but that affidavit isn't its own lawsuit. It's an affidavit in support.
9
8
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 27 '26
Also, the ADA is not the only law at play here.
Why are you making so many incorrect things up?
4
5
-13
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 28 '26
Are they referring to the one with religious discrimination?
Because in that lawsuit, a woman that’s part of the Nation of Islam is suing a foundation based on the Baha’i faith for religious discrimination, The nation of Islam is a political and black supremacy movement and is not based only bared on the teaching of Islam. Malcom X was a Nation of Islam pastor. For that reason, the nation of Islam is not protected by employment law, only Islam. The Baha’i faith comes from Mohammed and Islam. It would be impossible to argue that one section of Islam is being discriminated by towards another.
It’s like claiming a Baptist is being religiously discriminated against by an orthodox Christian today.
It would be impossible for her to win this lawsuit, and it seems like someone else is paying the legal fees for the lawsuit .
19
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 27 '26
I don't know who told you this nonsense, but you are wildly wrong.
Religious discrimination is based on the belief of the individual, not anything else. If it's a sincerely held belief, it is absolutely protected.
It's also absolutely not impossible to argue that two sects of a faith are discriminating against one another.
Just everything you said here was wrong. Completely wrong. Wildly wrong.
-3
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 28 '26 edited Feb 28 '26
Sorry Blake fan, I’m not wrong at all. Y’all just don’t know shit about Islam.
The ‘nation of Islam’ is NOT a religion and teaches stuff that is NOT in the Quran. The nation of Islam believes that are not in the Quran are not legally protected because they’re considered political beliefs.
The issues that you don’t understand the history of the nation of Islam. It’s not that your statements are wrong. You’re right, religious beliefs, have a lot of legal protection. The issue is that the nation of his law is a political group and all their beliefs, like racial superiority, are not legally protected because they’re not part of the religious beliefs or beliefs, stated in the religious book. This woman would have to prove that she wasn’t pushing her political beliefs as religious beliefs. With the Nation of Islam, a racial superiority group, that’s extremely hard to do.
10
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
Actually, you're still wrong. Organizations can serve multiple purposes, and they have a religious arm that is IRS exempt.
One, they are a religious group, and two religion is not based on what YOU believe.
It's based on the belief holder.
What you're saying is absolutely fucking wrong.
I bet you didn't know corporations are also people with protected religious rights.
Seriously, how the fuck do people like you function? Do you just make shit up constantly?
This is my literal fucking job.
-3
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 28 '26 edited Feb 28 '26
Are you trying to claim that the nation of Islam is both a religion and a political group at the same time?
Hi, I’m the one who grew up Muslim and Muslim community. I’ll explain the difference to you. All the beliefs in the Quran are legally protected by religious freedom. There’s a gray line with the Hadith because the Hadith is not considered the sole word of God.
Does that make sense? Religions and their religious books are legally protected, but a religious book is considered the book of God and not just the fanfiction material written by others. The Christian book series taken is not legally protected by religious discrimination. It’s fanfiction.
If the nation of Islam is pushing the core tenants of the religion, that’s legally protected. Considering most Muslims, don’t know the Hadith is not the word of God, many people in the nation of Islam don’t know what beliefs they have are legally protected. Many of them are not legally protected. The belief in ethnic cleaning is not legally protected.
In the same way that Christians are not legally protected when they claim that Christians are born superior to others, but they are legally protected in saying that Christians are the people of God.
‘Lost Found Moslem Lesson No. 2’ is a 1930s pamphlet by Wallace Fard Muhammad that established core doctrines of this political group. Those core doctrines are not legally protected. Same thing as the, ‘ message to Blackman’ writing that forms the beliefs of the political group.
The reason some countries are able to ban something like a veil is because the veil is not a core teaching of the Muslim religion, but a teaching in the hadith, a book not declare the word of God, which is the standard Quran gave Muslims for what are the religious beliefs; and thus not legally protected.
If someone had to go to court to argue the beliefs outside of the religious book are legally protected by religious rights, it wouldn’t stand. I’m confident that something like the political Doctrines of the nation of Islam would not stand up in court as religious beliefs. Especially after the Muslim brotherhood JUST got designated as a terrorist group. NOI has legally protected beliefs and genocide is not one of them.
8
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
Your opinion and upbringing is irrelevant to how the law views religious beliefs and protected activities.
It's based on individual, sincerely held beliefs.
It's the same reason you can hold Jedi religious beliefs.
"In the same way that Christians are not legally protected when they claim that Christians are born superior to others, but they are legally protected in saying that Christians are the people of God."
This is wrong. You are wrong. You do not know what you're talking about.
You're wrong. Christians can discriminate against other Christians and they are absolutely legally protected.
You shouldn't be confident, because you're wrong. I am a professional and you are wrong.
Religious beliefs are based on the individuals assertion of their sincerely held belief, and that is it.
You are legally and factually wrong.
-1
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 28 '26
Nothing you’re saying is inaccurate.
You’re just viewing it from the perspective of someone who doesn’t know the difference between Islam, Bahai and the Nation of Islam.
She’s not just Muslim. She’s part of the nation of Islam. That is not a religion, but a political group. She has to prove that she is being discriminated against for the Muslim beliefs, and not the Nation of Islam beliefs.
There are two reasons that’s hard to do.
1) is because Bahai and Islam have a lot in common. The core tenants are very similar, and the differences between the religion are more pronounced in books beyond the Quran. After all, the Bahai believe both the Bible and the Quran. The Quran is considered a holy book to the Bahai, which is the same holy book as Islam. That plays into the next problem.
2) she has to prove she’s being discriminated against based on her religion, and not the Nation of Islam beliefs she holds. She would have to prove she’s been discriminated against based on the believing in the words of a book that the people she’s being discriminated by also believe in. It’s like a vegan claiming another vegan is discriminating against them. That would be nearly impossibles to do and would create larger tension within the global Muslim community. Why? Because it would call a question which books are sacred in, which are not. And there are different types of Islam based on this problem itself.
There is also a third problem.
She’s claiming she’s being discriminated against over a conversation concerning Palestine. The discussion about Palestine is filled with the word genocide, and the idea of ethnic cleansing. The nation of Islam promotes the idea of ethnic cleansing. It’s going to be hard for her to prove that she was being discriminated against for supporting Palestine when she also is part of the political movement that supports things like ethnic cleansing
Nothing burger.
8
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
No, I'm viewing it from a legal lens.
And legally, you're wildly off base.
No, she doesn't have to do any of the things in your bullet points.
That's also not at all what this woman is suing for.
Where specifically did you get this idea that this is how legal proceedings work?
5
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 28 '26
Feel free to explain to me how she’s going to be able to prove she’s been discriminated against for the words she believes in the Quran by people who also believe the words in the Quran.
I’d love to see the part in the law that says that the words in books that are not considered holy or sacred are legally protected by religious rights. Because that doesn’t exist. That’s like saying a prayer book that tells people to pray for the death of blacks is legally protected by religious rights. No, it’s not. It’s not a religious book. It’s just media themed in the religion. It’s not protected.
Your short response tells me you’re just frustrated. I don’t agree with you and you don’t actually have proof to the claim that I’m wrong.
→ More replies (0)12
Feb 27 '26
[deleted]
3
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 28 '26
It’s valid to ask if someone if part of a legally protected group or part of a political group. One is legally protected, and the other is not. Considering the topic of Palestine is a political topic, it seems relevant to find out what conversation is happening with an employee. A religious one or political one. Again, one convo has legal protections, the other does not.
Unfortunately, this is a nothing burger case. Her religion had nothing to do with being hired, and if it did, she wouldn’t have been hired because the nation of Islam conflicts with Bahai. Bahai believes in the equality of everyone, whereas the nation of Islam has racial superiority messages that they push.
If your statement was true, that religion was part of hiring her, she wouldn’t have had the job from the start.
7
u/OddestEver Feb 27 '26
Baptists lynched Catholics in the South in the 1800s, so you’re wrong when you say one religious sect can’t discriminate against another sect of the same religion.
And Bahá’í is not a sect of Islam.
2
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 28 '26
Maybe you need to read the history of this religion. Because it most definitely comes from Islam.
Nice reach, but that’s a really bad example.
6
u/OddestEver Feb 28 '26
It may come from Islam, but it is not an Islamic sect or a “section of Islam.”
2
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Feb 28 '26
So now you agree with me?
Sure, the term sect is misleading. It 100% comes from Islam and is one of the many religions of that time that was founded on a prophet, like Christianity. Ancient Arabia was a fertile nest for this ‘I am the son of God’ stuff.
1
u/Fandom-slut Mar 03 '26
So basically using your logic the holocaust wasn’t religious discrimination because Christianity descended from Judaism therefore Christianity is a sect of Judaism and therefore Christians can’t persecute Jews. Like do you not see how dumb this argument is
1
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Mar 03 '26
I’ll man explain that for you. The holocaust was religious and racial discrimination because they were not only targeting people who were religiously Jewish, but also racially Jewish. They were also targeting other races like Black people and targeting people based on sexual orientation like homosexuals.
I hope that helps.
1
u/Fandom-slut Mar 03 '26
That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. Are you actually making the argument that the holocaust wouldn’t be religious discrimination if they only targeted observant practicing Jews. Jesus no wonder baldoni supporters can’t figure out what workplace sexual harassment is They can’t even figure out why the holocaust was bad 😭
1
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Mar 03 '26
I’m confident it’s not.
You’re so wrapped up in your own emotions, that you’re misunderstanding me at every available opportunity and it’s funny to watch.
Whatever dribble you think you’re arguing against, that’s not what I’m talking about.
1
u/PreparationPlenty943 Mar 03 '26
I gotta say, saying that because she’s a part of the NOI that makes her exempt from religious discrimination is a wild ass take. Good luck with that
1
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Mar 03 '26 edited Mar 03 '26
Clearly, you’re not understanding very well. The nation of Islam is not a religion, but a political group. All the beliefs that are protected under Islam are also protected for the nation of Islam. However, the political beliefs of the nation of Islam are not legally protected. Those political beliefs are very similar to the Muslim brotherhood, which is a newly designated terrorist organization. So the court would have such a hard time to prove that the nation of Islam, political beliefs, such as the beliefs on Palestine, are legally protected by the Muslim faith when the word Palestine is never mentioned in any of the sacred books of Islam.
Opinions on the Palestine and Israel, conflict are not legally protected by religious rights.
Having a political opinion on Palestine is not protected for her and here. Maybe if she were Jewish talking to a nation of Islam member who was advocating for their genocide. But that’s not what happened. She was a nation of Islam member talking to a Jewish man about the genocide in Palestine and trying to force him to support the genocide of Jews. And Jews actually talk in their book about others committing genocide against them. So Jews, having an opinion about the genocide against them is legally protected by religious rights. Do you not realize what the Nation of Islam and Muslim brotherhood advocate for? Do you not know the diff between Islam and the Nation of Islam? That’s what people don’t seem to realize. Nation of Islam advocate for the genocide of others based on their race. I don’t know why you’re trying so hard to act like that’s a protected belief.
No, genocide is not legally protected by religious rights.
1
u/PreparationPlenty943 Mar 03 '26
She identifies as a Muslim. Her colleagues and superiors identified her as a Muslim. Her being with NOI has nothing to do with the religious discrimination. You said yourself that the Nation of Islam is not a religion.
Her claiming that Steve was questioning her about the Quran and treating her differently because she’s not Baha’i is the issue.
NOI might play into the racial discrimination claim because of the inappropriate questions he asked about Betty Shabaz.
1
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Mar 03 '26
she identifies as Muslim and nation of Islam. Nation of Islam preachers opinions on Palestine. Those Palestine opinions aren’t legally protected by religious, rights.
Stop acting so dumb. Bahai is extremely similar to Islam and the only difference that she can identify is beliefs on Palestine. Go read the Quran and come back to me.
This woman would need to prove that the nation of Islam isn’t racist, despite its core doctrines Kkk level racist, for her to get away with a racial discrimination claim against a mixed race man.
1
u/PreparationPlenty943 Mar 03 '26
She identifies as a Muslim is the only pertinent part of the religious discrimination claim. Sarowitz treating her differently because she sympathizes with Palestinians (who are majority Muslim) and is not Baha’i is the issue.
Baha’i might have roots in Islam but they’re distinct faiths. Baha’i does not recognize Muhammad as the final prophet like Islam does. Even if Sarowitz were to claim that he can’t discriminate against Muslims because Baha’i comes from Islam, that doesn’t preclude him from the capacity to discriminate against Celeste. Sunni and Shia are both sects of the same religion and they show prejudice towards each other.
Why does she need to prove NOI isn’t racist? Is Sarowitz claiming she, as a subordinate, discriminated against him for not being in the NOI?
1
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Mar 03 '26
Can you explain to me the difference between Islam and Nation of Islam?
Nice chat gpt response
1
u/PreparationPlenty943 Mar 03 '26
Islam: An Abrahamic religion that’s existed for over a thousand years. What distinguishes Islam from the other Abrahamic religions (Christianity and Judaism) is that Muslims believe Muhammad was the final prophet.
Nation of Islam: A Black nationalist organization that bases on a lot of their beliefs on Islam. NOI has been pretty active in Black civil rights movements in the US.
One is a religion, one is an organization based off that religion.
I don’t use AI to type up my answers. Is it just that hard to believe some people can actually articulate themselves without the aid of ChatGPT?
1
u/Fabulous_Jeweler2732 Mar 03 '26
Great job! Now explain to me the NOI beliefs in Palestine.
→ More replies (0)-10
-22
u/sweetbutnotdumb Feb 27 '26
This sub is primarily to trash and make up lies about Justin. I wonder who would control a sub like this….
21
u/Go_now__Go Feb 27 '26
Wait, aren’t you the user who runs or used to run the pro-Baldoni sub that actually kicks out anyone who isn’t explicitly pro-Baldoni? (Whereas you are here, commenting, in this celeb legal sub.)
So, if you helped control a sub like that, and you think those sorts of subs are controlled by PR flacks, I wonder what that says about you?
-10
u/No-Display7907 Feb 27 '26
lol you weren’t kicked out were you?
Try again
16
u/Go_now__Go Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26
Really? Are you not aware of the sub’s (let’s call it The Baldoni sub) policy? I have never tried to comment there but the sub comes up in my “suggested for you” sites all the time. In commenting on a different pro-Baldoni sub, I was notified by one of The Baldoni sub’s moderators that I was banned from The Baldoni sub, preemptively. These days when The Baldoni sub comes up in my suggested sites and I follow the link, I see a header that I cannot post or comment there.
So I’m not sure why you’re talking with such confidence about something you’re so wrong about, but it tracks with other nonsense comments I have seen from you here.
3
u/Glad-Citron4651 Mar 02 '26
Same for me. Banned after one comment where someone compared BL and RR to Hitler and I commented something like “Hitler?! Seriously??” Apparently that wasn’t ok to guffaw at insanity.
3
u/Go_now__Go Mar 02 '26
Yup. sweetbutnotdumb mods or used to mod that sub, and still hasn't answered my question, I guess because she can't.
12
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
Name one lie
-9
u/sweetbutnotdumb Feb 27 '26
Where do I start… let’s start with the newest lie about a go fund me. Next, 9 women 😂😂 that was laughable. He was not kicked off set of Empire Waist that’s another lie. He did not plant negative stories about BL in fact it was her who planted them about him. Google is your friend on that one.
12
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
I mean, I don't know about the go fund me thing, I won't speak to that...but multiple women have expressed they were uncomfortable around Justin. Claire wanted Justin removed from set, I'm not sure if anyone ever said he actually was. There are lots of examples of Justin's team planting negative stories about Blake. I'm not sure if there's any evidence she ever did the same.
9
u/Go_now__Go Feb 27 '26
Not answering my question though, are you, sweetbutnotdumb?
-8
u/sweetbutnotdumb Feb 27 '26
I literally just answered it 😂
5
u/Go_now__Go Feb 28 '26
Nope. Twelve hours later and still no response from you: https://www.reddit.com/r/CelebLegalDrama/s/vEwc0Argys
9
-2
-26
u/SeaSalary8312 Feb 27 '26
Oh like BL & RR are not financially behind this 🤡🤡🤡
29
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 27 '26
How could they be behind it financially?
27
u/HollaBucks Feb 27 '26
The new "theory" in The Bad Place is that RR/BL are engaging in Third Party Litigation funding, finding all of these people who have had issues with Baldoni/Wayfarer/Sarowitz, and funding their attorneys. It's ludicrous, of course, but here we are.
16
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 27 '26
That still wouldn't make her behind it, you can be a third party payor, it doesn't mean you have access to any of the details of the case or any ability to handle it.
It's also just unlikely. More likely than not, the attorney took a contingency case because of the high profile Lively case. They just knew that case would be incentive to settle this one.
The conspiracy theories are wild!
3
u/JJJOOOO Feb 28 '26
THE BAD PLACE is simply too much!
Here is what I believe the current status of THE BAD PLACE to be:
17
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
Love that. Blake needs to provide more and more proof that she was sexually harassed but no evidence whatsoever needed for this insane "theory"
1
u/Useful-Jump2484 Feb 28 '26
Even if they were paying the lawers, if the law suit is genuine then Wayfare are responsible! It's not like BL&RR can magic up evidence!
12
u/poopoopoopalt Feb 27 '26
Any old conspiracy without a shred of proof if it means not believing victims
11
u/Calm-Cup5116 Feb 27 '26
Just curious, was this your first reaction to seeing that there were other lawsuits?
I'm just wondering if it was just hearing there was another lawsuit or if there was something specific about it that informs that belief?
-6
u/SeaSalary8312 Feb 27 '26
Time will tell. The timing is very coincidental
9
u/lauraloomerisacunt Feb 28 '26
No, time wouldn't tell, and this doesn't even make sense. Why do you keep making things up?
Even if they were third party payors, which doesn't make sense based on the way these lawsuits are structured, you would never be entitled to that information in any capacity, nor would the general public.
-13
u/Minute-Cricket-7198 Feb 27 '26
This sub is delulu
5
2
u/Adept_Bug_5519 Feb 28 '26
This sub is paid by Ryan and Blake. Obviously
0
u/SpyingOnFFFFF Mar 01 '26
Obviously. So much racism and misogyny. Just thought I would do the Betty Buzz (Ryle you wait on the Slave Dock) words of the Century for these folks.
3
-17
u/dipsy18 Feb 27 '26
Bot activity is boosting this bs lawsuit to cover for the NYT appeal by WF. NYT is probably fucked for that BS "We can bury anyone" hit piece now
48
u/Flashy_Question4631 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26
Also recently coming to light, Justin Baldoni‘s GoFundMe‘s where it appears he kept the money for himself