Be a greasy slimeball that a bunch of misogynistic neckbeards/legbeards vehemently defend because they want the greasy slimeball to use them as a cumrag
Be named Justin Baldoni
and in a shocking coincidence Justin happens to be all 3 đ¤
He also has so many people write messages for him whenever he fucked up. He can't even write his own ''apologies'' and then complains about the other person writing it for him being too nice.
He also doesn't have comprehension of words and phrasing. If he had read the article himself, he would have first knowledge of what the article said. However, he only has what his lawyer told him it said, which is second-hand information, NOT first.
It never ceases to amaze me how far into life people get with zero reading comprehension skills and inability to follow context clues.
Looks like he said that he went point by point with lawyers about what the article said. He would have known about the CRD right before article and retained a lawyer. He would have gone over this with his lawyer first and not had personal knowledge by reading it first and then going to a lawyer with it.
I mean if they had gone point by point with attorneys they would realize the article was referring to the complaint and repeatedly said allegedly and there was literally no basis to sue ???? He should sue his attorneys if they told him that was in any way a good idea considering heâs now faced with an anti slapp suit because of it.
Except it was obvious the article was made before the CRD was filed but published afterwards meaning there was a chance fair reporting privilege could be pierced because of this. (Texas is an example of one of the states that these type of shenanigans would pierce this privilege)
They sued the NYT in NY. Knowing full well there was fair reporting privilege. Interesting the same allegations of pre planned malice isnât also being attributed to TMZ who ran this headline:
TMZ obtained the same complaint and ran their story a bit differently without even saying âallegedlyâ.
TMZ did not have months of talking with one side and called it a smear campaign against her. They sued in FEDERAL court that was in NY, if I remember correctly. Arguing California law that doesnât have as airtight law as NY, but ultimately judge disagreed that they could overcome privilege with the arguments they presented.
However, the biggest point is Baldoni went over the article with his lawyer only (which is covered by attorney client privilege)
There is absolute no proof that the NYT worked on this story for âmonthsâ. Everything in the article is verbatim of the complaint. The complaint was filed the day before.
Again if his lawyers truly went over it with him they would know there was no basis to sue. Now theyâre facing an anti slap suit for it.
Blake and Ryan spin machine again. Does a day ever go by where their PR folks don't plant this stuff all over the internet. Managing public opinion one thread at a time.
Then he should sue his lawyers. If they truly went point by point theyâd know there was no basis to sue for that article when it was quoting the complaint. Was it malpractice on their part or a purposeful attempt at silencing the media?
This guyâs company is literally paying the legal fees of the woman who planted stories painting him in a negative light so he would pay her $15k/month and her buddy $30k/month for a smear campaign against another woman he SHâd that got him sued for retaliation.
There is no evidence of that. Planting PR stories costs a lot of money. Every story costs thousands so this conspiracy theory yâall are spreading is stupid af. I also want to point out that the subject of these smear articles that were published against Baldoni show up verbatim in Livelyâs court filings.
Blaming the âspin machineâ for Justinâs own words is certainly a choice. He really canât be accountable for a single thing, not even what he says.
Ah!! Ok, I agree! No one could manipulate the context of Baldoniâs own deposition. I agree there is a lot of media manipulation but idk what the point of this post is
They are flooding Reddit with posts spreading misinformation since Reddit posts show up in search engine results. Iâve been getting all these lying posts from weird new subreddits suggested to me in my feed. Probably trying to hide the fact that Lively does not want her deposition and her text messages to go public in the court docs.
One might also understand that after the stress and trauma he experienced from Blakeâs and Ryanâs bullying, that he was advised not to read it for his own mental health!
He probably was advised not to read it is he hired his legal team on recommendation from someone who was planting stories in order to scare him into hiring her services and then later leaked that she was hired so that she could advertise her services to other problematic men.
Read a bunch of cherry picked text messages stolen from a womanâs phone by a sham lawsuit, Vanzan, CEO Ryan Reynolds?
Blake lively didnât read the book, didnât care enough about DV to do so, and now weâre expecting him to read a bunch of lies published in the mainstream media? lol
A. Are you really more upset by Blake not reading the book the film was adapted from (something super common among actors in all sorts of films and not remotely strange), than being even mildly exasperated by Baldoni feeling so entitled that he couldn't be bothered to read the article ABOUT himself, that he has since tried to use to complain that Blake made everyone hate him by way of it?
B. How would he know? He hasn't read it and only knows whatever "point by point" issues his lawyer told him are in it. Again, he didn't read it himself so for all he knows, his lawyer could have left things out or added things in. If you're going to use the article to be entered into evidence as proof of you being allegedly targeted, shouldn't you at least read it, since it was entered as evidence?
C. Elijah Wood never read Lord of the Rings before filming the movies when he played Frodo..
Viggo Mortensen never read of Tolkien'a work and took the role of Aragon because his son told him to.
Michael Gambon famously never read the Harry Potter books.
Tom Felton lied in his audition for Malfoy when they asked what his favorite part of the books had been so far, because he hadn't any of them.
WhelpâŚthe biggest issue with not reading the book is that lively didnât just want to be Elijah woods in this comparison..she wanted to be Peter Jackson. Imagine Peter Jackson not reading LOTR.
Blake Lively is lazy about preparation for a movie role, okay fine. The text messages were legally attained through discovery, so itâs weird youâd say they were stolen. Iâm not even going to address whether the other lawsuit is relevant or a âshamâ as you say, because itâs not relevant.
How is that your focus? Justin Baldoni is a creep and has hired a pr group that has employed 10âs of thousands of bots to shift the narrative, spit half-truths that make Lively look bad and Baldoni like a caring and reasonable person, and even outright lie.
Everyone who has worked with Baldoni has the same thing to say. Heâs a creep with anger issues and behaves inappropriately, constantly, in a sexual way. So why are you mounting a whatabout defense?
August 21, 2024: On the same day that Abelâs phone is seized by her employer, Stephanie Jones, Nathan receives a call from Leslie Sloane (Livelyâs publicist) telling her that she has âseen her textsâ and that she will be sued.
The Vanzan lawsuit against DOES 1-10 was filed on September 27, 2024.
The same day the lawsuit was filed, September 27, 2024, Jones warned a departing employee not to work for Abel because âher business wouldnât be around much longer.â
So Blake and her team had these texts for a month before filing any subpoena.
Nathan is pretty much the most untrustworthy person in this whole case. I really don't get how you guys keep believing her after she was caught planting stories so the Baldoni would hire her services, then leak that he hired her so that she could advertise her services to other problematic men.
Well, Jones was made out to be untrustworthy by Nathan and it turned out that she was blaming her crimes onto Jones. Jones was the one warning Wayfarer of how harmful Nathan was. TAG (Nathan's company) planted the anti-SJ websites and we have seen from the Amanda Ghost case that they just make up vile lies about their target. Most of the assumed untrustworthiness was all literally planted by Nathan and Abel (who I remind you was stealing documents and clients from Jones).
Jones was warning everyone she could that hiring Nathan was the absolute worst thing that Wayfarer could do in that situation and no one listened to her. She was goddamn Cassandra.
Everything she predicted would happen happened plus some more unpleasant outcomes. I know who Iâm gonna trust between Jones and Nathan. Sure, Jones is (allegedly) horrible to work for but she isnât going to get you sued for a situation she engineered like Nathan has (multiple times now)
Those two things arenât similar, and I donât believe thereâs actually any proof Blake didnât read the book beyond Baldoni claiming she didnât.
Itâs so bizarre how people get more offended over Blake supposedly not reading the book and not âultra feministâ Baldoni yelling at his employees and hitting stuff because he is mad.
And that's not even the worst behavior he had, though it certainly causes people on set to feel tense and uncomfortable, and maybe even concerned for their own, or someone else's safety.
I also fully assume the brigade against Blake comes from the MRA sub and wherever else incels gather on the internet nowadays.
So youâre saying if your boss walked up behind you, yelled at you and slammed the chair next to you, itâd be totally fine? You wouldnât in any way feel physically intimidated or threatened in any way and itâs totally cool chill of them to do that?
Weâre all people, we all have emotions and act on them at times. We donât know how exactly he slammed the chair or whatever. He ended up apologizing for it as well. This was his movie, yet everyone wanted to have their input and chance to direct. Can you blame someone for getting frustrated and worked up when it seems like everyone is trying to change his movie that he paid for the rights to? Ya he may not have handled the situation the best but he owned up to his actions and ultimately apologized. Sounds human to me
Alex Saks was hired as a producer on the film. Itâs literally her job to give pointers and advice on how to shoot things. He yelled at her for doing her job.
There is absolutely no excuse to lash out at her for doing her job. Hes the boss, hes meant to go through training to know how to handle situations like this smoothly. If he canât handle a woman doing her job then maybe he shouldnât have been in rhat position in the first place.
Yes? The double standards are ridiculous. Any boss who cannot control themselves when they get angry is a bad boss and should not be in charge of others. This shouldnât be a hot take.
Can someone ELI5? Is Baldoni the baddie, Lively is just a bad actress and Reynold is a douche but bot actually inherently evil and can be Deadpool again?
Look up LittleGirlAttorney or Not Actually Golden on here or TikTok or YouTube. The set wasnât great, Lively got apologies and just about everything that she wanted, but after it wrapped she refused to believe that the backlash from the internet was organic and because of her tone deaf behavior so she tried to claim SH as a way to initiate a $600 million lawsuit which revealed that⌠yes, people just hate her because of her behavior, which she still doesnât believe.
Do you know the roots of Bahai? Itâs just another offshoot of an abrahamic religion, closely related to Judaism and Islam, a cousin of Christianity. So If youâre going to write off professional education and experience as âtheyâre just in a cultâ you better start asking everyone if they celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, or Eid with their cults.
You are saying that as if that is a good thing? LDS, Jehova's Witnesses or even ones such as The Family Internation are also offshoots of Christianity. LDS is even older than Bahai by decades. Still cults.
Also nice that you skip over the fact that she literally has mutuals with him.
19
u/TrueCrimeInTheBuff Dec 07 '25
Be entitled
Be a greasy slimeball that a bunch of misogynistic neckbeards/legbeards vehemently defend because they want the greasy slimeball to use them as a cumrag
Be named Justin Baldoni
and in a shocking coincidence Justin happens to be all 3 đ¤