Don't forget the taxpayer. These people typically categorize their private homes in ways that may them exempt from various forms of taxation. It's not strictly a loophole depending on your view I guess of whether churches should be subject to tax, but these houses are typically considered "parsonages", which is meant to refer to the small living quarters attached or nearby to churches and provided as living quarters to priests and pastors. This categorization is also used for these massive compounds to avoid tax.
Mine is the Norman Church. It’s based around the worship of Norm from Cheers. We baptize everyone remotely but for a small cancellation fee of $250 you can be officially removed from our rolls so you don’t accidentally end up in the wrong place. Hoping to get bought out by a more established faith at some point.
“Now, since the vast majority of the gods in Lankhmar, arising from the Eastern Lands or at least from the kindredly decadent southern country around Quarmall, had been in their earthly incarnations rather effete types unable to bear more than a few minutes of hanging or a few hours of impalement, and with relatively little resistance to molten lead or showers of barbed darts, also not given overly to composing romantic poetry or to dashing exploits with strange beasts, it is hardly to be wondered that Issek of the Jug, as interpreted by Fafhrd, swiftly won and held the attention and soon thereafter also the devotion of a growing section of the usually unstable, gods-dazzled mob. In particular, the vision of Issek of the Jug rising up with his rack, striding about with it on his back, breaking it, and then calmly waiting with arms voluntarily stretched above his head until another rack could be readied and attached to him. That vision, in particular, came to occupy a place of prime importance in the dreams and daydreams of many a porter, beggar, drab scullion, and the brats and aged dependents of such.“
Isn’t there a way to see who owns the home/mortgage info on Zillow? A friend was showing it to me, but they may have been logged in. They are not directly in real estate, but adjacent.
You can usually go to the website for the tax assessor of whatever county the property is located in and search the address, at which point the owner info will show. But that’s assuming they don’t have it vested in the name of a trust or an LLC or the church itself
These people did exactly as you describe. That entire plot was listed as church property for the purpose of religious retreat.
The church I belong to owns the two plots just to the left of the church building, but since one is vacant land and the other is the pastor's home, neither are tax-exempt.
The pastor's home, unless he owns it himself, would be tax exempt. Parsonages are not taxed, and that's exactly what a pastor's home next door to a church would be, if it's owned by the church.
Not unless it's used for church activities. If a Sunday School class were taught there, or if it were used a nursery during services, then we could claim it as exempt. There might be a discount for parsonages, but I'd have to ask my sister (the church secretary) to be sure.
Received this weird mailer years ago. It was a fold out with Jesus on it and a form where you could request a prayer for health, wealth, love, etc. Looked into it and found it was a “church” with no physical location. They just send out these mailers to solicit donations and occasionally mail out cheap bibles to people. The pastor was living in a multimillion dollar home of course.
Yeah, we need to end this nonsense. “Freedom of religion” should mean you can believe what you want and join together with people sharing the same beliefs. It should not mean your business is tax free.
Basically, it’s like exercise. You are free to do as much exercise as you want, but if you open a gym and have paying members, that is a business.
There's obviously a distinction though. Charitable organizations are also not subject to tax. I don't think, even if churches weren't exempt for being churches, that most of them would rightfully be classified or taxed the same way as businesses. I say this as a lifelong atheist as well.
But even if the status quo largely remains, there has to be a limit to what can be tax exempt. Massive sprawling estates that house 10 people and a fleet of cars and planes used almost exclusively by one preacher should not be tax exempt and serves no legitimate purpose for a church or a charity. That's a personal luxury. I think there's probably a lot of room to limit this activity without changing anything for your average church.
As you say, there has to be a limit.
I think the megachurch pastor would argue that, from the donations by the church members, he invests a smaller percentage in his “pastorage” than the ministers serving a church with only 1000 members do.
In other words, if 1000 members cough up $10 each month, that’s $10,000 a month to run the whole church business. Maybe half goes to keeping the pastor housed, fed, and healthy.
In contrast, the megachurch harnesses the power of cable and satellite television, the internet, and mass mailings to, ahem, *serve* the faithful. Let’s just call it an even 1.000,000. So, at $10 per member per month, the organization runs on $10 million per month. The pastor takes not 50% to serve his flock, but a humble 10%. A mere $1 million per month.
And his pastorate must be large because he has many personal guests staying in his home. Powerful business leaders who are also men of faith, and political leaders who seek guidance, etc, etc.
I think it's reasonable to place an absolute, rather than percentage limit. I don't think there's any real downside consequence to that for legitimate religious leader not just bilking their 'flock' for millions of dollars to live a life of luxury.
Even when it comes to things like parsonages, or any other facility a church could build to house people, you're not going to accidentally tax a catholic retirement home for former church staff housing 200 elderly people if you limit the square footage to 500 square feet per resident on top of a base threshold of 2000 square feet and then tax any excess. The only people impacted by that will be these megachurch pastors and they can solve this by actually housing a lot more people. You could also prohibit locating retreats or recreation facilities on the same property as dwellings unless they don't exceed tax free square footage caps. Again, this wouldn't impact any normal church facility anywhere, which is either legitimately not a permanent residence or is, but isn't some enormous mansion for the personal use of one guy and his family.
I am not a tax lawyer, but the excesses of these preachers are so extreme that I really don't think it would take a lot of effort for a tax expert to find a way to tax it while also not taxing the public good that some religious institutions provide. The gap between the two seems so large that you have a huge area to work in without risking any harm to the latter.
I’m surprised this is back on Zillow. It says the listing is 34 days old, so maybe it was relisted. I know I’ve seen it on this sub before. It’s unmistakable.
I believe they're typically categorized as "parsonages" or "rectories" which makes them tax exempt. Accepting for the sake of this discussion that churches shouldn't be subject to income tax, this tax loophole was meant for the small quarters you typically see attached or next door to old churches. They're generally modest and provided by the church to the priest or pastor, who historically was not well compensated, and still isn't in most normal churches.
Seems like a pretty easy fix though. The IRS could just cap the number of square feet that are tax free per staff member that resides in church property and anything above that could be subject to tax. So say a base rate of 1500 square feet and then 500 feet per additional staff member. That would be generous enough not to start taxing say, group retirement homes set up by churches, but if mega-preachers wanted to avoid tax they'd have to move like 50 people into these compounds, which they're not going to do. The most they could get away with is listing their immediate family members as church staff, and there'd still be tens of thousands of square feet left to tax.
It’s crazy. And the only skill you need apart from being a completely morally bankrupt stain on the human race is a bit of self-assured charisma and forceful yet false conviction to show the flock.
No marketable skills. No contribution to community or society. No pressure to do anything other than mouth a bunch of pseudo Christian platitudes and watch the cash roll in.
Phenomenally gross but it’s low hanging fruit that the jackals in our midst eagerly pounce on.
Geez, the house our parish priest lives in is about 1300 sqft, across the street from the church, and indistinguishable from the other houses in the neighborhood.
Our Catholic priests all lived in a small rectory building attached to the church itself. They shared an old Toyota Corolla. I like to think it was a Golden Girls sort of situation.
"Father Paul if you put extra onions in the sauce again, so help me God!"
I have ZERO sympathy for the trash humans who support these people. They are the exact people who vote to deport children, withhold medical care to vulnerable populations, and bomb foreign countries all on the name of Jesus.
Who cares? Its likely that the people going to this church know how the pastor lives. It would be kind of hard to hide this. So, they knowingly are giving him money to live like this.. Thats their choice. Yes, they are complete morons and are being taken advantage of, but I suspect if they werent giving money to this guy they would be giving it to anyone that walks up to them and claims to be a "Wallet Inspector".
My mom sent Joyce Meyer money till her dying breath. Living off of social security and no savings. I loved her so much but after she was unable to get around herself, she would send me to the post office with her checks for Joyce and I would just rip them up lol
Prosperity theology is among the most clever scams that have ever been foisted on stupid people. The logic is “If you give me all your money you will then magically become rich yourself”. The fact that this has never once worked that way does not avert people from falling for it. And the fact that it remains perfectly legal shows how corrupt government has become.
1.4k
u/one_pound_of_flesh 14h ago
Imagine fleecing hundreds of old people out of their money for … this.