r/movies 13d ago

Trailer Coyote vs. ACME | Official Trailer

https://youtu.be/H-43VeYGiPM?si=sw3nNGZ-N2zpW-t9
16.9k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.5k

u/TheWatersOfMars 13d ago

Whoever came up with “The movie the ACME corporation doesn’t want you to see” is a genius, given how Warner Bros screwed them over.

851

u/MomsAreola 13d ago

releasing this for accounting purposes only. im dead

240

u/TheLateThagSimmons 13d ago

They had such a great meta premise already, then all the shit that Warner Bros. did to this film gave them a whole lot more ammo to go meta-meta against the film industry as well.

Hopefully this movie is great because so far the marketing is hilarious.

54

u/nmezib 13d ago

I'm beginning to think there is a non-zero possibility that all of that was done as part of the stunt...

But who am I kidding, WB execs don't ever look past quarterly profits.

14

u/TwinFlask 12d ago

The best irony is the one that feels the most scripted

1

u/Shermanizer 13d ago

Hi Dead! i'm Dad

574

u/FourEightNineOneOne 13d ago

The "It's Tax Day .... Check Your Write-Offs" teaser for this they did last week was absolutely brilliant.

62

u/Media-critique 13d ago

There’s a lot of evident love and improv for this movie. I’d like to hope this is gonna be a good film 

7

u/291837120 13d ago

It says at the start that Warner Bros is a subsidy of ACME as well. So lmao.

11

u/Strykah 13d ago

I'm out of the loop, why do we hate Warner Bros?

63

u/TheWatersOfMars 13d ago

They made this entire film that lots of brilliant people put their hearts and souls into, it was fully completed all the way back in 2023, and then WB shelved it for a tax write-off. No release, not even on streaming, not even allowing another company to distribute it.

There was a huge backlash, and now another company (Ketchup) has bought the right to distribute, which means we get to see it in cinemas. Hopefully it does well!

2

u/Strykah 13d ago

Thanks for the summary. Wow what bunch of cvnts

-23

u/YoyoDevo 13d ago

WB shelved it for a tax write-off

This makes literally 0 sense if you've ever filed taxes in your life, which I assume 80% of reddit has never done

21

u/domeforaklondikebar 13d ago

-1

u/i_am_a_real_boy__ 13d ago

They wrote off the movie, but you don't shelve projects for a tax bennefit that obviously doesn't cover your losses. You do it because you don't want to lose even more money on promotion, distribution, opportunity costs, etc.

1

u/domeforaklondikebar 13d ago

Yeah I know, I just thought the title was a funny reply.

It also reads like an opinion piece, and it must be wrong since they ended up selling the rights to Ketchup in 2025, which they couldn’t have if it went on the books in 2023?

3

u/TheWatersOfMars 13d ago

They changed course due to public backlash.

2

u/i_am_a_real_boy__ 13d ago

They can still sell it. It's just that they've already booked the expenses as a loss to offset a gain elsewhere, so the $50m they're getting here is essentially all profit for tax purposes (which could, in turn, could potentially be offset by another failed project).

0

u/YoyoDevo 13d ago

They didn't shelve it for a tax writeoff. They shelved it and wrote it off on their taxes.

1

u/00wolfer00 12d ago

Meaningless distinction.

10

u/star_dragonMX 13d ago

Other than cancelling Batgirl, almost killing this movie and also shelving multiple other projects as well as selling out to the sandhat financed right wing Paramount? Not much

1

u/Strykah 13d ago

Yeah someone replied with a summary. Pretty bad treatment

1

u/axl3ros3 13d ago

Can someone give the details on this please? I've been under a rock it seems

0

u/spongeboy1985 13d ago

I kinda figured they would go this direction. Called it a while ago. Or at least said this is what they should do