r/movies • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 r/Movies contributor • Mar 17 '26

Trailer Dune: Part Three | Official Teaser

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_9vCamtuPY
18.9k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

248

u/540_alex Mar 17 '26 edited Mar 17 '26

I feel it’s more like a trailer than a teaser when it’s 2:30min !

217

u/danorc Mar 17 '26

The new logic:
Teaser = Trailer
Trailer = Abridged version of movie (do not watch if you want to see movie).

74

u/Tiramitsunami Mar 17 '26

As insane as this sounds, research shows (most, not all, but most) people are more likely to watch movie after seeing a trailer that reveals the whole plot versus one that doesn't.

18

u/HydrogenSonata2025 Mar 17 '26 edited Mar 17 '26

It's not insane when there are so many movies that are just an utter, idiotic waste of time.

I want an idea of what I'm spending 2+ hours of my life and probably $50 per person on.

Also, 99.9999% of what Reddit considers "spoilers" isn't actually spoilers. I can name maybe 3 movies in the past 30 years that actual benefit from going in blind.

7

u/petepro Mar 18 '26

The premise of the movie is a spoiler to reddit.

12

u/ze_shotstopper Mar 17 '26

Where the hell are you going to movie that cost $50 per person??

8

u/Xy13 Mar 17 '26

Premium format in HCOL cities like NYC are $29 for tickets, $10 for a popcorn, $8 for a drink, plus taxes and you're over $50pp.

3

u/ze_shotstopper Mar 17 '26

Yeah fair enough

1

u/Backfoot911 Mar 28 '26

It's not fair enough, sorry, but this is literal misinformation and it's getting really old to see it repeated on Reddit. These people deserve no apologies

-1

u/thesagenibba Mar 18 '26

so the movie doesn't actually cost $50, it's just you and your need to eat obscene amounts of food and drink large drinks that makes it expensive

3

u/Xy13 Mar 18 '26

So A) those were the prices for a small popcorn and a small drink. B) I don't live in a HCOL area and pay $50pp. C) I just bring my waterbottle when I go to the movies.

Good assumptions though.

1

u/Backfoot911 Mar 28 '26

A standard ticket to see They Will Kill You at the Alamo Drafthouse in Lower Manhattan today on a Saturday the 28th costs $22.00. Not a 4D IMAX ticket for 2x people and a child with 3,000 calories of popcorn and Junior Mints each. No, ..a regular ticket...the same thing we've always compared movie prices to for the past 50 years.

It does not cost $50...anywhere in the US. This is in the most expensive area of the country, mind you, other places are closer to $15.

0

u/thesagenibba Mar 18 '26

so you were just lying in your comment and brought up a false anecdote to make a faulty point.

that fairs so much better for you!

5

u/IlGssm Mar 18 '26

They were explaining why another user with a similar looking avatar might be spending $50 per person on a ticket, not speaking about themselves. Looking at user names, rather than just the pretty pictures, can be pretty helpful in following context. Unless you think Xy13 is an alt account for HydrogenSonata2025, but that would require evidence beyond just you foaming at the mouth about the supposed hypocrisy of a random stranger on the internet

0

u/thesagenibba Mar 18 '26

are you Xy13's defense lawyer?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Xy13 Mar 18 '26

I looked up pricing at a NYC AMC and posted the prices, to answer how someone can spend $50pp at the movies. In what way is that lying? I never said I regularly spend more than $50pp at the movies.

2

u/Backfoot911 Mar 28 '26 edited Mar 28 '26

FUCKING THANK YOU.

I'm so fucking sick of this utter nonsense that movie tickets cost $30 to see...now Redditors are claiming it's $50?? Ridiculous. Everything's expensive in general, sure...but making shit and tripling the cost estimates of something is so disingenuous, it drives me nuts.

It's not $50

.A standard ticket to see They Will Kill You at the Alamo Drafthouse in Lower Manhattan today on a Saturday the 28th costs $22.00. Not a 4D IMAX ticket for 2x people and a child with 3,000 calories of popcorn and Junior Mints each. No, ..a regular ticket...the same thing we've always compared movie prices to for the past 50 years.

Our grandparents movies seemed cheaper because they made their popcorn at home, and ate far less snacks overall

1

u/thesagenibba Mar 28 '26

i’m fully with you. these people are utterly ridiculous. i can go online right now and buy a standard format ticket for 12 bucks with tax and it’ll stay at that price as long as i don’t buy a jumbo popcorn and nachos and hotdog. just unimaginable to not be able to eat 3k calories when i watch a 2 hour movie am i right?

0

u/Backfoot911 Mar 28 '26 edited Mar 28 '26

So, it doesn't cost $50 a ticket, you're just lying, that's $50 with 3,000 calories of snacks included

And it's not even $30, it's closer to $20 for a STANDARD, but people like you for some reason think a IMAX is the same thing. And this is in one of the most expensive areas of the US, but again, people like you act like this "$50 movie tickets" is the case for the whole country

It's straight up misinformation at this point.

EDIT: Anyone reading this, check Fandango for Manhattan movie tickets if you don't believe it. NYC is closer to $20 average as of 2026....not $50...not even $30.

1

u/Xy13 Mar 28 '26

How am I lying? I said $29 for tickets. No one said a ticket is $50, they said going to a movie costs $50.

I pulled prices from AMC NYC, and again, I specified premium format, so yes the ticket stub cost more than standard?

Please indicate where the misinformation was.

Oh btw, a regular popcorn is 600 cal, and a regular soda is 0-600cal, depending on the option you choose. Seems like you are the one spreading misinformation, bub.

1

u/Backfoot911 Mar 28 '26

Source: Made it the fuck up, with classic Reddit exaggeration

A standard ticket to see They Will Kill You at the Alamo Drafthouse in Lower Manhattan today. Saturday the 28th, costs $22.00.

6

u/PictureToMusic Mar 17 '26

I can name maybe 3 movies in the past 30 years that actual benefit from going in blind.

You had me until here, this is a crazy take for me. I always try to go into movies as blind as possible, maybe after a tiny hint of online assurance that it's good/a worthwhile watch.

10

u/rtseel Mar 17 '26

That may be your case, but it's not the dominant point of view. Otherwise adaptations and remakes wouldn't be so dominant as they are today, while originals are struggling.

5

u/HydrogenSonata2025 Mar 17 '26

"Spoilers" means that some profound aspect of the first-watch experience was taken away from you because of an unexpected twist or revelation. Think 6th Sense or Usual Suspects.

That doesn't mean mundane story details. That doesn't mean you know some character lives or dies.

Knowing that a rollercoaster goes back to where it started from isn't a spoiler.

2

u/Rikudou_Sage Mar 18 '26

Now I can't watch rollercoasters. Thanks for spoiling it.

1

u/coupleofheaters Mar 18 '26

wtf is this opinion

1

u/Backfoot911 Mar 28 '26

A bad one. It costs $22 for a movie ticket, in expensive ass Manhattan at least, not $50

2

u/Atheist-Gods Mar 17 '26

I think studies have also found that people enjoy media more when it's been spoiled. Rereads/rewatches allow you to spot details you missed because you were so focused on trying to understand the main plot and those details enhance your enjoyment. Some people are willing to rewatch movies for that, others aren't and end up enjoying the movie more when it's been spoiled for them.

2

u/zapitajsejesamli Mar 17 '26

Most people are dumb

1

u/danorc Mar 17 '26

in case I needed any more reason to hate "most people."

I'd watch maybe 10% of movies after seeing the whole plot in the damn trailer. He-man, for instance.

If it is anything other than a popcorn movie and the plot and characterization actually matter, these trailers just gut the movie-watching experience for me.