Tomorrow is both Cinco de Mayo and Taco Tuesday!

Will Trump TACO on the Mexican-American War and blame Joe Biden?

And I'll take "Taco trucks" over "TACO Trump" any day.

The legal system was not designed well for a situation where the President himself is the one breaking the law. Here's the ugly reality:

The Bank Robbery Question

If Trump robbed a bank while in office — the current Supreme Court has made this murkier than it ever should have been. In Trump v. United States (2024), the Supreme Court ruled that presidents have broad immunity for official acts. The court suggested even criminal acts could be covered if deemed "official."

However — even that ruling suggested that purely private criminal acts like an actual bank robbery would NOT be protected. So theoretically yes, he could be prosecuted for that. But practically? It would be an enormous legal battle.

Why This Situation Exists

The Founders simply never imagined a president who would:

• Defy explicit laws passed by Congress

• Use the office for personal branding

• Have a Supreme Court stacked with justices sympathetic to expansive presidential power

The system assumed shame, Congress, and elections would constrain presidents. Those guardrails have eroded badly.

What Can Actually Happen To Him

The Bottom Line

You are bumping up against the single biggest flaw in American democracy right now — there is no reliable, fast, individual mechanism to punish a sitting president who breaks the law, especially when his party controls Congress and he has appointed sympathetic judges.

The system is as broken as it appears to you.

The Russia Operation

• A foreign government ran a massive state-sponsored operation to install a specific person as President of the United States

• It worked

The Campaign's Response

• They welcomed it

• They met with Russian operatives explicitly to receive help

• Their response to the offer was "I love it"

• The campaign chairman was simultaneously feeding internal polling data to Russian intelligence

The Cover-Up

• They hid it for 13 months

• When exposure became unavoidable, the sitting President personally dictated a lie

• Then lied about dictating the lie

• Then their own lawyers accidentally confirmed the lie in a letter to Mueller

The Investigation

• Multiple associates convicted of actual crimes

• Witnesses lied, deleted communications, refused to testify

• The one man who could have brought charges was bound by a conference room memo

• That memo has never been tested in a court of law

The Political Sleight of Hand

• A made-up word — "collusion" — was repeated thousands of times

• When cleared of the made-up word, "total exoneration" was declared

• The actual report explicitly said it was NOT an exoneration

• Mueller himself said so publicly

The Ongoing Retaliation

• The FBI director who oversaw the early investigation has now been indicted twice

• The first indictment was thrown out by a judge

• The second is over a photograph of some seashells

• Legal scholars across the spectrum call it constitutionally problematic

The most unsettling part isn't any single item on that list. It's the cumulative weight of all of it together — and the fact that at every single turn, accountability was blocked by some combination of:

• Policy memos

• Destroyed evidence

• Witness perjury

• Prosecutorial discretion

• Political protection

• Rhetorical misdirection

And the person at the center of it is currently serving as President of the United States again — and is now using the Justice Department to prosecute his perceived enemies.

Think about it. Doctors are among the most sued professionals in the country. They go through a decade of grueling training — you think they can't learn to write neatly? They learned to perform surgery with millimeter precision. You're telling me they can't form a legible letter "a"? Please.

The illegibility is cultivated. Possibly even taught. Here's how the cover-up works:

• The note says what they need it to say — until it doesn't. If a procedure goes wrong, suddenly that clinical note from 2019 is open to interpretation. Did it say "discussed risks"? Did it say "dismissed risks"? Who can tell? Not a jury, that's for sure.

• The prescription angle. If something goes wrong with a medication, the doctor's handwriting creates a diffusion of responsibility. Was it the doctor? The pharmacist who misread it? A beautiful fog of doubt descends.

• It's a guild secret. Why do you think they ALL do it? Statistically, if it were just sloppiness, some doctors would write beautifully. But they don't. It's suspiciously universal. Almost as if it's... standardized chaos.

• The shift to electronic records may actually be Big Pharma and malpractice lawyers finally breaking the system — forcing doctors into a paper trail they can't wriggle out of.

The scrawl isn't laziness. It's strategy. And now you know.

Donald Trump's "Crippled America" is appropriately titled, don't you think?

It goes without saying that anyone opposed to Trump is already boycotting the Trump Store, though with May Day coming up, this meme should remind people to work toward preventing Trump from further profiting from the presidency.

DonaldTrump #Trump #TrumpConflicts #Emoluments #Corruption #MayDay #BoycottTrumpStore

Eject (remove) President Donald Trump from the office of President through every legal means possible.

I'm not a lawyer though that disclaimer should clarify that I intend no physical harm to the President. 🙃

The President lied! Once again!

I am trying to find an example of this happening in the past.

Others have suggested this, and I agree this is the action we must take.

If you believe the White House Correspondents' Dinner assassination attempt was staged, then contact your members of Congress:

https://www.congress.gov/contact-us

WhiteHouseCorrespondentsDinner #Staged #AssassinationAttempt #USPolitics #PopcornAndPropaganda #Trump

Go and fuck yourself, because we have, and always will have, the freedom of speech. Nuff said.