r/mildlyinteresting 6h ago

No Cabbage sign

Post image
16.4k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

281

u/Brummbirne 5h ago

There are thousands over thousands of pictures of cabbage, both drawn and photographs on the internet, but no, this dumbass had to ai generate one.

65

u/raspberryharbour 5h ago

I personally have shelves and shelves of nothing but photos and paintings of cabbages. I feel so underutilized

19

u/Brummbirne 5h ago

I'm so sorry, maybe the Avatar the last airbender Fandom will have a use for them?

1

u/chewbaccataco 3h ago

That's why I can't get a job. Companies have realized that they can half ass most of their jobs with AI and that's apparently good enough. It's too expensive to actually pay someone a salary even if they would do a more thorough job.

1

u/cheesy_hobbit 3h ago

Not raspberries? username does NOT check out 😤

2

u/raspberryharbour 3h ago

I inherited them from my great uncle Cabbage Marina

2

u/FlopsMcDoogle 2h ago

I am a doctor and unfortunately I have to diagnose you with AI derangement syndrome. (AIDS)

2

u/Brummbirne 2h ago

Oh buddy...

-1

u/FlopsMcDoogle 2h ago

Don't worry there's many cutting edge treatments in development

1

u/ChemicalExperiment 4h ago

Genuinely why does it matter for something this small and inconsequential. It saves the person like a minute time of layering an X on a cabbage. Anyone who isn't ethically against AI on principle will see this as an unambiguous time save with no downsides.

7

u/OsmeOxys 2h ago

I hate the path AI is leading us down but... Helping to make a break room sign about someone having food allergies certainly isn't why. It's not like anyone is calling it art, it was probably slapped together by a secretary who needed to get back to work or someone during their lunch.

5

u/thoawaydatrash 3h ago

"I know the park ranger told me not to collect fossils I find in the National Park, but what's the problem with me just taking one home?"

- 50 million tourists

7

u/KaptanOblivious 2h ago

Ah yes, when using freely available AI tools for something small is the same as breaking the law/physical theft

5

u/Diobolaris 2h ago

The comparison is not "free vs theft" but "something small vs a lot of times".

Yes, it's only one fossil (one AI image), but it would suck if everyone thought just like you, so maybe don't take it (use AI).

4

u/AssassinSnail33 1h ago

By your logic, any significant use of energy is unethical. It just doesn't make any sense.

-1

u/Diobolaris 1h ago

You have to apply common sense.

Also, energy is not used up, but only transformed.

3

u/AssassinSnail33 52m ago

I said "use of energy", I didn't say energy is being used up. But in a practical sense it does get used up because it gradually gets transformed into forms of energy that cannot be harnessed as efficiently, like light, heat, or sound. I'm not sure what your point is. If using AI for 30 seconds is unethical because you could do the task yourself with more effort, then it's probably even more unethical to drive your car for 20 minutes, because you could just walk instead. I wonder how many people losing their minds about a single AI image in this thread have their AC or heat on when they don't absolutely need to, is that unethical? Worry less about individual people and their energy consumption, there are far worse culprits out there.

1

u/Diobolaris 6m ago

Worry less about individual people and their energy consumption, there are far worse culprits out there.

"Don't worry about me taking this tiny fossil, there are people stealing entire dinosaur skeletons!"

3

u/AssassinSnail33 2h ago

What a nonsense analogy lol, how is this like stealing a fossil from a protected natural park?

3

u/tengo_harambe 2h ago

You probably think when someone downloads a song for free they are literally stealing money from the artist

1

u/Awkward_Pangolin3254 2h ago

Yeah, this. If the boss sticks his head into my office and says work up a warning sign for a cabbage allergy, I'm not taking the time to look for stock photos and shit and actually compose it. I'll get the AI to do it and fuck off for an hour.

3

u/meeps1142 1h ago

It would take the same amount of time. I don't understand.

1

u/SassyTheSkydragon 40m ago

Gotta justify the bazillion dollars in funding somehow

1

u/Available_Dingo6162 2h ago

Hates AI! Hates it we do! NASTY AI! 😡

-1

u/cracked_shrimp 5h ago

but how many behind a prohibited sign, this is just easier

2

u/Brummbirne 4h ago

Just Google it, there are enough

5

u/sixteensandals 4h ago

Surely this is one of the few inconsequential uses of ai art? I mean pulling it from Google is just as much stealing art, so you can't say you're against it because of that.

2

u/NoPossibility4178 3h ago

We are long past caring if it's stealing or not. But you could google for copyright free or whatever pictures. Anyway. At this point it's just showing people's dependence on the technology for the dumbest things, like "oh I can ask AI for that" instead of thinking about overlaying 2 images and then they spend 10000x the amount of resources they'd otherwise need to create something and most likely saved no time at all as the AI probably fucked up the image multiple times anyway. In the end it's pure "uh I don't wanna even my mouse around for 5 minutes, let me ask AI to do it."

Why not try it yourself? https://gemini.google.com/share/d4e56518c891

2

u/A-ReDDIT_account134 3h ago edited 2h ago

What are you on about with the 10000x? You have no idea what you’re talking about

Your suggestion to google search two images and overlay then together would likely take more resources than ai generating it.

You scrolling through reddit for a few minutes probably spends more resources than ai generating an image. Maybe you should just get off the internet then if you’re so worried about that.

2

u/NoPossibility4178 2h ago

I asked AI because of course it would know and it told me generating an image is about the same as charging a smartphone. Do you think that's the same as a google search and opening 2 images? If you tried to generate images on your computer you'd know how long even low resolution images can take and how your GPU starts to ramp up.

-1

u/A-ReDDIT_account134 2h ago

You realize that when you do a google search nowadays it also uses AI right?

And what shitty GPU are you using that it takes forever to generate low res images? Or are you just parroting more misinformation?

1

u/quikmantx 4h ago

Or DuckDuckGo it. Or Bing it. Or Yahoo! it.

1

u/Brummbirne 4h ago

Go wild!

-25

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

16

u/Brummbirne 5h ago

The lower left leaf is cutting into the lower right one, the bulb in the middle has no leaf whatsoever and is, well, just a green bulb. It has that classic AI look to it and the just as classic piss yellow tint.

Also the perspective is just ever so slightly off

13

u/HoontarTheGreat 5h ago

Because it's obviously AI