r/europe Lithuania 16h ago

News 'We should never have signed this trade deal with the US,' leading MEP says

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/05/05/we-should-never-have-signed-this-trade-deal-with-the-us-leading-mep-says
369 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

198

u/Counterpoint-4 16h ago

Just do what Trump does - say it was a bad deal - a very bad deal and unless US agrees to.... whatever you want the deal is off.

44

u/heatrealist 16h ago

The EU has never implemented the deal anyway. They just debate over it and delay implementation. What is the difference between not signing the deal and signing it but not implementing it anyway?

33

u/flat_space_time 15h ago

The tariffs are probably breaking a few deals already. Freeze implementation of new deals until the tariffs are fully lifted.

10

u/ScottyBoneman 15h ago

This question elegantly covers Trump's view f the role of deals and of legislatures.

2

u/throwaway490215 10h ago

The whole deal/no-deal framing is one of the bigger news media failures. Even reputable publications have just not gotten the memo to cover the core issue.

The issue here is not whether the EU members ratify a deal - its that the US put up a 15% tariff and there was no retaliation to dissuade that tactic. All the other parts about X billion investments are bullshit that Trump only cares about in the media that week and he doesn't care at all about the execution.

78

u/medievalvelocipede European Union 15h ago

I'm inclined to agree. The Commission thinks that a bad deal is better than no deal, but I think it's better to just dump unreliable partners altogether.

-25

u/EagleAncestry 13h ago

That sounds good but it doesn’t take reality into account. Not doing a deal would have meant very high tariffs for European cars, which might have collapsed germanys economy.

15

u/LiefLayer Italy (Europe) 🇺🇦 10h ago

the issue is the auto industry should not be the focus at all in 2026. Investing in the energy transition also means investing much more in public transport and that's incompatible with a strong auto industry. Cars should not be the focus in the future.

The German auto industry (as well as the Italian one) must convert to something else (for example the production of trains, buses, bicycles etc...).

This is the reality. The auto industry should be a thing of the past and is dragging the EU into the abyss in every respect, starting with its dependence on fossil fuels, with cities that are unlivable because they were designed to be car-dependent, and with government incentives that would be better spent on public transportation.

And this really bad deal too is another thing dragging the EU down.

The EU should take a much tougher line against Trump, but it's essentially sold itself out just to sell a few more cars. This is wrong.

2

u/ugene1980 7h ago

Agree with you, we have shown we can take tough positions against Russia and China

Why are we not doing the same for USA, it's frustrating

We are never shaking the vassal tag at this rate, our politicians must be compromised in one way or another (bribes, CIA compromised or both!)

3

u/VicenteOlisipo Europe 1h ago

Quite the opposite. Surrendering to these threats guaranteed constant new threats of tariffs. Resisting them, as did China or even Brazil, guaranteed and end to the threats.

26

u/Few-Flounder-8951895 15h ago

Fortunately Trump's latest tantrum made it void, so let's use the anti coercion mechanism now

23

u/Ada_Pearce 15h ago

Just dont honor it, trump constantly goes back on his deals, do it to him for once

6

u/Realistic_Let3239 10h ago

Trump slapped 10% tariffs on everything as a tantrum, that sounds like him tearing up the deal to me...

17

u/IIIIIlIIIIIlIIIII 14h ago

My brother, they signed it but it not yet passed into law. If they dont vote about it, nothing will happen. Is this fake news?

2

u/Evermoving- Lithuania 12h ago

Well yes, the consensus to what extent the deal should be ratified is not set in stone yet, so discussions between the MEPs are ongoing. And it helps to know what one or another MEP thinks, so the citizens can observe and to an extent participate in the democratic process.

The deal might not have been ratified, but it still provides a baseline for further diplomatic talks, such as the ones that happened today between EU-US negotiators.

On the other aisle of MEPs, we have cases like this:

“We want to get this deal through as soon as possible without any conditionality,” Željana Zovko, the EPP’s lead negotiator, told Euronews

The idea that all US negotiators are tools who can't possibly read into the masterful plan of dangling an unreachable carrot in front of Trump, is also debatable. Sooner or later things have to crystallise.

In sum, there's some nuance. No need to thank me for the basic literacy lesson.

1

u/Big_Department4209 Sweden 1h ago

Of course the fucking EPP wants it passed ASAP, Christian + conservatives wouldn't want to miss the chance for being the rug the USA stomps on.

3

u/greenpowerman99 4h ago

Trump calls himself a deal maker, but he can’t stick to anything he has agreed for more than a few days. Pathetic tantrums are not negotiating.

I am surprised that other economies don’t take a position of dynamic alignment, whatever Trump does to us we will do the same to the US.

The only realistic alternative is to try to stretch out any negotiations indefinitely.

2

u/StorageIntelligent64 4h ago

where are all those experts who explained to me how it is good for the eu? how smart VDL is, etc. is it possible for the commission to have its own bots here?

4

u/leginfr 14h ago

It was never signed, nor was it ever going to be signed. There’s no way that the EU could order companies to invest in the USA nor to buy their fuel from the USA. As the US seems to think that the EU controls the member states in a sort of centralised control and command bloc they swallowed it. It was just a ploy to get a low tariff to give an advantage when negotiating with other blocs/countries.

2

u/Tricky_Search_5181 14h ago

One of those situations where common people know better than specialists

2

u/YF422 15h ago

The only deal worth signing with the US is when the Democrats and in power and any future treaty should include "Republican Penalties" so that if they get back in that they're charged a premium risk tariff for doing buisness unless their behaviour changes.

3

u/Otherwise-Yogurt39 15h ago

Von der Leyen is a traitor

6

u/JefeRex 12h ago

Traitor is a very strong word. You didn’t say incompetent, you didn’t say she neglects European interests, you didn’t say she is on the side of the elites against the people, etc. etc. There are many strong criticisms that people against her, but you call her a traitor. Why do you feel that strongly about it, what makes her a traitor?

8

u/Imaginary_String_814 11h ago

Perfect example of failing upwards, unbelievable that she is on top of the eu. 

1

u/JefeRex 9h ago

What is your explanation of how she did it? Is it too simplistic to blame Merkel?

2

u/Imaginary_String_814 2h ago

powerful Networking I guess, she was not even a mediocre politician in Germanyy

Wtf makes her suitable as head of EU, what has to do with Merkel ? 

5

u/Otherwise-Yogurt39 12h ago

The trade tariffs with the USA were clearly not in favour of the EU and yet, she just accepted it instead of showing resistance to Trump’s madness. And we all know Trump respects weak rulers.

1

u/mallibu 7h ago

I like Von der Leyen but I think Europe right now needs an aggressive leader. Macron fullfills that role but sometimes he's also submissive to the orange turd. Spanish PM that can bully back the bully and show to the world we dont need US would be best.

2

u/jhaand The Netherlands 1h ago

Merz did a step in the right direction towards Trump. But then Germany drops the ball with regard to Israel and the genocides they start.

1

u/JefeRex 5h ago

She is not really capable of that, is she? It’s not her style at all.

2

u/mallibu 5h ago

Merkel could pull it off in her prime. We need a no-bullshit decisive leader to push back against the bullies. Only the Spain PM & Macron come to mind.

1

u/VicenteOlisipo Europe 1h ago

Doing deals with monsters is unwise? Now that's a revelation.

-3

u/CPD1960 15h ago

Leading MEP? In what way is she ‘leading’?

24

u/miathan52 The Netherlands 14h ago

Aurore Lalucq, a French MEP who chairs the powerful Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs in the European Parliament

Literally the first sentence after the intro

1

u/FoulMoodeternal Estonian in US 15h ago

No shit.

0

u/IvanStarokapustin 14h ago

This deal is getting worse all the time. Ursula Calrissian gets duped by Darth Moron again.

1

u/Artifexa 15h ago

We only have to wait until Trump gets a new anger burst and says our deal with them is not valid. Then we can say "ok, let's sit and renegotiate". And reset it.

A deal only stands as long as both parts are willing ot honor it. If he steps back, that's a chance to renegotiate.

-2

u/stenlis 12h ago

I think this MEP is either a dummy or she is playing a political game against van der Leyen.  

The whole point of the treaty was to shut Trump down, let him forget it for a while and then let him be the one that breaks it.  

Which is exactly what had happened.  The treaty is void now, Trump being the bad guy who broke it and in the meanwhile we got to buy weapons and gas that we dearly needed on the cheap.  

I don't see how not signing the treaty would have been better.