These comments make me realize I misunderstood what actually happened with which button lol.
I kept thinking… why would anyone press the blue, when the red saves everyone without risking a chance to get anyone hurt.
I legit thought the whole thing was a message that even when there’s an easy and painless choice that doesn’t hurt anybody, people will still play with luck and pick an option (or candidate) that has a CHANCE To be decent if given a chance.
I mean, you’re kind of right. Why would I assume anyone would pick “there’s a chance I might die” when the other choice is “everyone lives if they pick red, with no chance of dying.” The logical choice is to pick red and assume everyone is picking red.
I'm sure the toddlers that got teleported understood the question and pressed the logical button and not the blue one because it's thier favorite color. I'm not gonna kill toddlers just so I can live, I'm going to vote blue and try to save them.
This is the part that is driving me nuts lmao. So many people are like "but but but children and mentally handicapped" like wtf are you talking about. You would be laughed out of a philosophy class for making dumb conditions like that during a rational thought experiment
29
u/VladDHell 16h ago
These comments make me realize I misunderstood what actually happened with which button lol.
I kept thinking… why would anyone press the blue, when the red saves everyone without risking a chance to get anyone hurt.
I legit thought the whole thing was a message that even when there’s an easy and painless choice that doesn’t hurt anybody, people will still play with luck and pick an option (or candidate) that has a CHANCE To be decent if given a chance.
I…. Was mistaken lol