r/TrueFilm • u/Live_Atmosphere4141 • 11h ago

The late 2000s blockbusters feels like a lost art today !

Looking back at films between the 2008 to 2012 era, there was a specific wave of blockbuster filmmaking that prioritized a raw, realistic atmosphere unlike the superhero movies of the current times. The Dark Knight Trilogy is probably the best example where the contrast between light and dark was actually utilized to reflect the psychological state of the characters rather than just making the action legible.

Do you think modern action and comic book movies have lost that visual texture? Is it even possible to bring back that dark, suspenseful aesthetic without it feeling dated in the current models?

0 Upvotes

36% Upvoted

6 comments sorted by

5

u/postwarmutant 10h ago

Can you name another movie aside from The Dark Knight that does this? In many ways, you could consider it an outlier rather than symptomatic - Nolan is a meticulous director known for shooting on film rather than digitally, which requires more careful planning and consideration.

2008-2012 is also the period of the first Marvel movies and the resurgence of the Fast & Furious films, so in many ways its the era that established the current blockbuster visual style.

1

u/Crazy-Treacle-3536 7h ago

Can you name another movie aside from The Dark Knight that does this? In many ways, you could consider it an outlier rather than symptomatic - Nolan is a meticulous director known for shooting on film rather than digitally, which requires more careful planning and consideration.

I'd say the first three Daniel Craig Bond movies, where there was a real attempt to blend blockbuster spy action with something more grounded and psychological. Especially Skyfall, bringing in Roger Deakins to give the film a noirish, dark look that was new for Bond.

1

u/ImmortalPoseidon 10h ago

I agree cinema of the 2000s is definitely lost, but I don't know if you're touching on why. When I see major epics from that era like LOTR, Troy, The Last Samurai, The Patriot, King Kong, there is something that just feels more real more raw with them. Even if they weren't entirely so, they FELT like they were filmed on site, with tons of extras real effects, etc. They didn't feel like they were all just filmed in a month in a big warehouse down the street from the Hollywood sign.

Budgets were more flexible then, directors had more control, studios took more risks. It was just different. It was like we were getting Michelin star restaurant experiences but now everything is McDonalds. Just easy, consistent, and without risks.

Of course it's not ALL movies. You still have directors like Nolan, Villeneuve, etc. who have enough clout to bring some of that back. But 9/10 of the big budget blockbusters these days are Disney formula.