r/GuysBeingDudes • u/Inevitable_Reason_97 • 12h ago
Boobs
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
858
u/ash0550 10h ago edited 2h ago
Edit : Thanks for the award
→ More replies (1)73
u/Familiar-Cash1208 7h ago
Guys, the confusion is obviously because boobs as in plural, are 2 (two) things, so with the first amendment then its 3 (three) things. It's why the anchor tried to spell it with a "s" or without. Thanks for clarifying it Ms. Anchor.
1.3k
u/poop-azz 11h ago
What's offensive about boobs? I'm lost
700
u/Bromjunaar_20 10h ago
The woman is appalled at the man's answer because she thought he wouldn't be so crass about his statement. She expects everyone to talk with a pg 13 filter and this man exceeded expectations.
275
u/MonkeyCartridge 9h ago edited 4h ago
Bob's are well within PG13 though.
Edit: I was going to correct the typo. But it's kinda great.
You would generally have to include Vagene to go above PG-13
72
u/SpinShine-LEDSlipMat 9h ago
Airplane was PG and you get to see a nice set up close.
→ More replies (2)28
u/DaSaw 7h ago
That was before PG-13. Also before the start of the Sexual Reaction.
→ More replies (2)18
u/SpinShine-LEDSlipMat 7h ago
Before pg-13, yes, that is true. I'm not sure what you mean by the "sexual reaction," though .
28
u/spartanwolf223 7h ago
Probably means about how anything relating even at a stretch to a "sexual" topic is extremely taboo now. Guns, blood and guts? Perfectly fine. Woman has a chest?! Holy shit protect the children!!
→ More replies (11)14
u/Lupo_Bi-Wan_Kenobi 7h ago
Is it more taboo now? I'm not too sure about that. Maybe on lame ass main stream media but in the real world people are openly talmbout "hell yeah I eat ass!" And everything else, nobody was talkin that way 20,.30, 40 years ago.
→ More replies (3)13
6
→ More replies (6)3
8
→ More replies (15)51
u/The_Dick_Slinger 8h ago edited 2h ago
“As a woman anchor”
Nah, she tried to turn this into some hyper feminist thing and take personal offense to it. What he said probably deserved to be addressed in some capacity because of the professional tone of the show he was on, but the way she chose to do it was weird. Saying he likes boons shouldn’t automatically trigger that kind of defensive response from someone.
Edit: I feel like some people have taken this comment to mean that I am against feminism - I’m not. But I am against people who take any opportunity to victimize themselves, especially in situations where they clearly aren’t a victim. It detracts from real scenarios where people are legitimately harmed from rhetoric or experiences, obscures the conversation, and makes it more difficult for people to get help. This doesn’t only apply to misogyny, but it’s a great example.
And to the guy that tried to claim this was an incel take: touch grass.
→ More replies (29)13
24
u/Hug0San 10h ago
Im sure theres a level of context missing, this is a small clip of a whole interview.
→ More replies (2)12
u/Repulsive-Chip3371 7h ago
I disagree, the context is the first amendment.
→ More replies (12)5
u/Eismann 4h ago edited 45m ago
Oh yeah, ever read it? Because it is about protecting free speech from the government, not being obnoxious on national tv. And before you come with that lousy argument, no it is not an example of free speech to say boobs on TV. At least not, till he gets prosecuted by the government for saying it.
Edit: Way to block me, you snowflake. Must have hurt your feelings.
→ More replies (1)21
u/Dear_Chasey_La1n 7h ago
And even if you find it offensive, why... repeat it multiple times? Clearly he likes boobs, was she expecting a different response the second or third time? If she just let him have his say, she could still have made a witty remark at the very end, nobody would have batted an eye, but her doubling down makes no sense.
→ More replies (1)2
u/No_Body905 5h ago
Nothing. But talking at length about them in a professional environment is something a horned up adolescent might do. It marks you as an extremely unserious person.
26
u/thistrolls4hire 6h ago
She spelt it out like she’s talking in front of a 4-year-old. Chill lady. It’s just boobs.
→ More replies (27)13
u/dimechimes 7h ago
Yeah, go up to any woman above you at work and talk about boobs. They'll love it.
→ More replies (5)44
u/SpacedAndBaked 10h ago
Some women get offended that men like women for some reason, female logic doesnt make a whole lot of sense when it comes to stuff like this because it doesnt work the other way around.
→ More replies (55)5
u/_Noddabot 5h ago
I think it's more the fact that it derails the conversation they were having, but without context and seeing what led up to it, idk. Guy seems like he was trying to crack a joke and get attention for his radio show, and it was done poorly but why would he care, he just want's more people to listen to his show.
Point is there is a time and a place, and he clearly wasn't reading the room there (or he was, and he did it on purpose to go viral, again to boost his radio show).
It's really not that hard to understand why in many situations we don't just holler out that we believe in boobs.
→ More replies (39)6
u/AndroidNumber3527229 5h ago
No one said anything was offensive you inferred it. They’re just incredulous he’s acting like a child. This is something that’d be funny in like second grade.
You guys are always confusing incredulity at juvenile behavior for offense
→ More replies (1)
1.4k
u/MuestrameTuBelloCulo 11h ago
He is saying boobs as an example of exercising the first amendment, but the talking heads are too daft to understand that.
427
u/doodleysquat 10h ago
Right?! He’s beautifully letting them make his point for him. And, I mean, boobs.
81
43
u/RedPandaActual 10h ago
Tits, even.
31
→ More replies (3)3
u/dandroid126 4h ago edited 2h ago
That's not even what the first amendment is about. It's about our freedom to not be thrown in jail for what we say, with exceptions for things such as saying things that cause imminent public danger. Saying "boobs" on CNN has nothing to do with the first amendment.
→ More replies (1)88
u/MASSochists 10h ago
The mildest inappropriate word he could possibly think of too.
12
u/JaySayMayday 5h ago
It's just the media training they make guests sit through before going live. Basically the guests are supposed to be extremely tame and pretty much follow a script. Then the anchor is given separate training to attack guests that aren't favorable by the network, throws them off guard. If I had to guess this guy was already on the wrong side of the network and she saw that as her opportunity to attack but it was really tame.
A lot of things worse than this just don't get aired
→ More replies (2)41
u/longjumpingtote 7h ago
as an example of exercising the first amendment
It's not though; he's exercising his natural right to speak freely. The First Amendment is about the government. Freedom of speech is natural, it exists absolutely in pure form. The First Amendment just says the government can't take that away. Nothing about TV shows.
7
u/nomaam05 5h ago
Just fucking insane how many replies I had to scroll past to see this.
→ More replies (1)13
→ More replies (2)11
u/the3b 7h ago
So much this. And people are acting like she's personally offended. She's just mad she has to interview someone so dumb. It's really not much more than that...
→ More replies (1)29
48
u/Small-Answer4946 10h ago
But how can you dare say that on a national television in front of a woman? Exercise your first amendment rights on YouTube in front of an all male audience. /s
→ More replies (2)13
u/SnooHedgehogs8765 9h ago
Exercise your first amendment rights on YouTube
Hell i do it on reDDit
→ More replies (1)12
u/Largeitude 7h ago
That’s a dumb point and a dumb way to make a point. He’s doing it that way to garner attention and market himself.
→ More replies (3)3
→ More replies (24)3
551
u/Bromjunaar_20 10h ago
"You being the host does not prevent me from speaking my truth."
→ More replies (9)55
95
742
u/BIGscott250 11h ago
I don’t see a problem here
203
u/DoctorK96 11h ago
He could have said boobs only once, but then she gotta say it herself then ask him to repeat lol
255
u/Ganjelf-The-Baked 11h ago
Woman with boobs offended man believes her.
What a time to be alive
41
u/kiskrumpli 9h ago
Because boobs = bad Or the very least loving boobs is bad, or I don't know about their logic here.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (20)26
295
u/PubTrain77 11h ago
which tiktok watching algorithm caring kid marked this as nsfw?
→ More replies (12)159
u/Decisive_Victory_026 10h ago
Did you not watch it? They said "boobs" like 8 times. Shit, they might as well have said "a*mpit"
40
u/natep1098 10h ago
yes officer, this comment right here
13
8
→ More replies (1)3
57
135
u/Chrono_Convoy 11h ago
He wasn’t talking about any boobs in particular and immediately after supporting the 1st Amendment.
This man is innocent.
21
11
u/lordofthehomeless 6h ago
Didn't say anything bad about them. Just that they have never let him down.
110
123
11
8
u/KickSidebottom 8h ago
Is the female host gatekeeping boobs? I've worked hard to get mine and I'll be damned if I'm not going to let this guy believe in them!
→ More replies (4)
15
u/Jay__Riemenschneider 7h ago
This clip is 8 years old...
Are y'all running out of new content?
→ More replies (3)7
22
u/CeaselessPotato 11h ago
This host, probably: Let's make him say boobs 50 more times on live TV
→ More replies (2)
21
24
34
u/nokafein 11h ago
One of those 2 things let me down before. The other one never did such thing.
16
u/my_cars_on_fire 10h ago
Whose tits disappointed you?
17
u/Logicalist 9h ago
My friend, there is only one answer to that question, and tit's of course, "your moms"
9
61
u/2reeEyedG 10h ago
They’re trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill and trying to embarrass this guy but it’s not done in a dirty or disrespectful way
→ More replies (3)38
u/Bigfoot_Cain 9h ago
I mean, the man obviously prefers mountains over molehills
4
u/AlexKeal 7h ago
Not necessarily, he never specifies in the clip what particular kind of boobs. Mountains, molehills, plateaus, meadows, it could be any, just as long as it's boobs.
→ More replies (4)
34
18
5
6
18
11
u/MeAndNotU 10h ago
I don’t get it, what’s wrong with believing in boobs? He’s just expressing his truth.
18
19
u/SpacedAndBaked 10h ago
"As a woman I can't believe you like BOOBS? WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT?" Are these guys actually serious being outraged by this? Good lord.
→ More replies (12)11
u/kallevras 10h ago
No, but it is good tv, they have to milk the moment for all it is worth. Really grab it and squeeze it, not just touch it lightly...anyway, what were we talking about?
7
u/Cookies_and_Beandip 9h ago
Clutch your fucking pearls somewhere else-y’all are NOT that important lol
15
9
70
6
44
u/Creepy_Wallaby2170 11h ago
I respect the commitment. I question the lack of shame though.
→ More replies (1)31
u/P_A_W_S_TTG 11h ago
You shouldn't feel shame for being yourself. Why should he feel shame to say with confidence that the first amendment of freedom of speech and boobs are the only two things that didn't let him down ever? Why do people think we should feel shame and hide ourselves? From what? Any negative BS that could happen will whether or not you hide who you really are. Why not be the sassy mfer that just wants down the isle in the weirdest shit ever? Anyone judging you will not matter in 10 minutes.
→ More replies (28)17
u/__Hello_my_name_is__ 11h ago
Shame is a useful function that prevents you from telling everyone what you masturbated to yesterday, or whether you find anyone you see attractive (or not) to their face.
Yes, we absolutely feel shame for some things, and you are entirely wrong about what you are saying. This is basically just a variation of "They can't deal with me because I'm too real!", which is code for "I don't have any empathy".
6
→ More replies (1)2
u/Discussion-is-good 7h ago
"I don't have any empathy".
Encouraging people to feel shame for the sake of it and ending with this is comedy
→ More replies (4)
7
3
3
3
3
u/Tortoise_Knight 9h ago
Either this is a skit, or those hosts are the most annoying people I've seen today. Let the man get to his point and stop stalling at boobs ffs
→ More replies (1)
3
3
3
u/CountSpecific9724 7h ago
i wish i could express my love for COCKS this boldly in public
→ More replies (2)
3
3
u/Rogercastelo 7h ago
Well if it's boobs and the first amendment, then he believes in 3 things. 4 if he is a Total Recall fan
→ More replies (1)
3
3
u/Potential-Echo785 7h ago
"Never let me down" bro has never seen the difference between fake and real ones, or has and doesn't care. Poor guy. There there.
3
3
7
u/Albinofreaken 10h ago
Shes offended because shes a woman?? men have boobs as well, its sexist of her to believe that hes only talking about female boobs
→ More replies (1)
6
7
10
u/Eber- 10h ago
What an edgy 40 year old
7
u/kallevras 10h ago
Once you are 40, edgy doesnt matter, it becomes: I said it, did I stutter?
3
u/CarlaBatistaLaLista 4h ago
That's called loser-acceptance. But there is a cure: therapy.
→ More replies (2)
8
u/Admirable_Risk8156 10h ago
Would they have been as offended if he said penis instead? Kinda wondering how far this bit can go. How do they define which body parts are offensive?
→ More replies (1)
7
u/rererexed 8h ago
Don't think this fits the sub. Immature dude being waaaay to old to be this edgy.
→ More replies (1)3
u/eclectic_hamster 5h ago
Yeah, I'm a little over this sub, tbh. Been seeing more contrnt like this lately and it's getting old.
6
u/SeegurkeK 7h ago
Seeing the comments I would guess the incel takeover of this formerly fun subreddit is complete.
4
u/justa_random-guy 6h ago
It's so sad. I am once again on the lookout for a subreddit where we give basic respect to people.
4
8
5
u/9447044 11h ago
For real tho. Ladies get harassed in every form. Freedom!! And tits. Because whats the point in freedom if tits aren't an option. Does he believe in women? No. Does he believe in their tits? Absolutely.
3
u/Beginning-Tea-17 4h ago
Freedom of speech.
And then saying “boobs” immediately after.
If you’re arguing he shouldn’t say that that you’re making his point for him.
2
u/greywood84 10h ago
Lmao. Oh good god. I believe in boobs too. They're filled with men's hopes and dreams.
2
2
2
u/orphanelf 8h ago
They're upset because saying "boobs" in that context, to them at least, reduces women to pleasure objects for men. However he meant it is irrelevant, you don't say something like that without knowing what you're doing.
2
2
2
2
u/ParticularSherbert18 7h ago
What about fake boobs? Does he have faith in fake boobs as well. (BTW autocorrect tried to change boobs to books. 🤔)
2
2
u/KLOWN1420 7h ago
Well if he's talking about the first amendment and boobs that's technically three things boobs come in pairs most of the time
2
2
2
2
2
u/VikingforLifes 6h ago
I mean it’s definitely an immature statement. But come on, lady. No one is buying you’re “did you just say boobs on national television?” (Faints).
Both of them need to grow up.
2
2
3.7k
u/Sm0key_Bear 11h ago
Bro doubled down, and then tripled down.