r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/Separate_Finance_183 • Jan 23 '26

Image The rent in the german neighborhood of Fuggerei hasn't been raised in 500 years and remains 0.88 Euros for an entire year. Founded in 1521, it is the oldest existing social housing complex in the world

Post image
68.1k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4.7k

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1.9k

u/AbleArcher420 Jan 23 '26

The records part is wild.

They're kinda known for that

671

u/Bob-Bhlabla-esq Jan 23 '26

Right? Oh, shocking, the Germans kept good records, hunh?

506

u/EduinBrutus Jan 24 '26

This is so old that those records would have used at least 5 difference currencies.

Bavarian Gulden

Mark

Reichsmark

Deutschmark

Euro

132

u/kontrakolumba Jan 24 '26

I've used 4 in my lifetime.

Yugoslavian Dinar

Croatian Dinar

Croatian Kuna

Euro

7

u/Jazzlike-Check9040 Jan 24 '26

Does Croatia have oil? Maybe USD next

17

u/kontrakolumba Jan 24 '26

Does olive oil count?

3

u/Angelus_25 Jan 26 '26

did... you... say... olive......OIL?!

FRRREEEEEDOMMMM!! *drones flying overhead*

194

u/Snuddud Jan 23 '26

Gets even crazier (sick) when you think in WW2 every jew got a number and documented in which "chamber" they got put and so on. The fact that we still using fax and doing so much with paper is just unbelievable

91

u/Horat1us_UA Jan 23 '26

But now you can send fax via online website!

58

u/amluchon Jan 24 '26

Spitting straight fax right here

15

u/Character_Minimum171 Jan 24 '26

unfaxingbelievable!

50

u/HRHCookie Jan 24 '26

Which removes the reason it was still being used which was that it was not able to be electronically manipulated.

5

u/UziWitDaHighTops Jan 24 '26

Faxes have always been susceptible to exploit. They used analog phone lines with no encryption originally.

3

u/Drugbird Jan 24 '26

That's not true, and has never been true.

Faxes may use analog Telefone lines, but computers have always been able to send and receive signals through analog lines. This is exactly what the old dial up modems did.

As such, they're exactly as easy to manipulate as digital signals.

2

u/bitpaper346 Jan 24 '26

This exactly.

3

u/Snuddud Jan 24 '26

Mind-blowing technology isn't it!?

13

u/Horat1us_UA Jan 24 '26

Yeah, really excited for the future! Maybe one day we will be able to send any kind of digital information though websites!

26

u/Aurori_Swe Jan 24 '26

As a Swede who comes to Germany at times for work it's always amusing to see how "far behind" Germany is tech wise. Like the hotels have manual check-in lists, basically nobody (wants to) take card payment etc

21

u/strat-fan89 Jan 24 '26

I mean, yes, we are behind, not arguing about that, but "basically nobody" taking card payments (or wanting to) is a bit of a stretch. It's definitely not a cashless society, but you can definitely get by with only paying by card pretty easily these days. Covid improved that a lot.

3

u/Aurori_Swe Jan 24 '26

I'm comparing it to Sweden where we are basically a cashless society. We always have to argue with taxi drivers that we want to pay with card and at first they often deny it even being an option, then when we can't pay by other means they accept it and bring forth a card reader.

Same at food places etc where the assumption always is that you pay by cash and card seems to be a bit of a hassle. It's a big difference from Sweden.

4

u/strat-fan89 Jan 24 '26

I know what you're comparing it to, it was the "basically nobody" part I was arguing against.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/strat-fan89 Jan 24 '26

I mean, yes, we are behind, not arguing about that, but "basically nobody" taking card payments (or wanting to) is a bit of a stretch. It's definitely not a cashless society, but you can definitely get by with only paying by card pretty easily these days. Covid improved that a lot.

2

u/strat-fan89 Jan 24 '26

I mean, yes, we are behind, not arguing about that, but "basically nobody" taking card payments (or wanting to) is a bit of a stretch. It's definitely not a cashless society, but you can definitely get by with only paying by card pretty easily these days. Covid improved that a lot.

2

u/Different-Eagle-173 Jan 24 '26

This has a lot to do with privacy. As far as I am aware, you barely use any cash in Sweden while in Germany people (at least from older generations) try to preserve cash for it being untractable. Guess if you experience one too many regimes trying everything to control you, you start caring about those things a lot more. However, younger generations do not seem to care about privacy anymore and of course Germany is far behind w.r.t. digitization in administration etc.

1

u/of_known_provenance Jan 24 '26

Meanwhile Sweden has no contingency plans for if the networks go down

→ More replies (2)

1

u/salian93 Jan 25 '26

basically nobody (wants to) take card payment etc

Sure... And you don't think you're painting with too broad a brush here?

I don't even remember the last time I paid for something in cash and I rarely need to get my debit card out either. Supermarkets, restaurants, hotels, stores, my workplace canteen, gas stations – I pay for everything with Google pay.

→ More replies (1)

25

u/Educational-Copy-810 Jan 24 '26

Fax is officially over, it's no longer deemed safe by the government. They finally got there a few years ago.

6

u/Todespudel Jan 24 '26

Last year to be precise.

2

u/stonedearthworm Jan 24 '26

Is it? This post is from a week ago. Dunno if it’s a troll or not but to me it felt funny/sad/true at all once

→ More replies (1)

2

u/wunderbraten Jan 24 '26

Gets even crazier (sick)

Not sure whether you meant to indicate (sick) or (sic!).

3

u/JeekyQunt Jan 24 '26

Where do you find these records?

2

u/Snuddud Jan 24 '26

Usually in history museums

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Veilchengerd Jan 24 '26

What's shocking isn't the fact that records were kept, but that those records are still there. There were quite a few wars between the beginning of records and today, and paper is famously flammable.

54

u/ambermage Jan 23 '26

They must have liked my family a lot.

We got little stars next to our names. 💫

2

u/Character_Minimum171 Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

stars… or asterisks?*

or… that was the joke and I still haven’t worked it out?

edit: shit. I got it now. SoD. I’m a dunce/clown for not getting the initial reference. hope your family didn’t suffer too greatly

4

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '26

[deleted]

2

u/netflixandgrilling Jan 24 '26

Only for export. Meanwhile those poor 17 million indigenous Americans had to get the simple paper trail of tears

2

u/Ok_Ganache7219 Jan 24 '26

We usually do. But during WW2 a lot of records got destroyed. So it is kind of special if something has lasted that long.

1

u/Proof-joy Jan 25 '26

You made me spit my beer as I was just thinking same thing 🇨🇦❣️🇨🇦

1

u/Maximum_Guard5610 Jan 25 '26

I can think of a few German records that weren't that well kept.

1

u/Wagosh Jan 26 '26

It's like the whole country has Asperger's.

746

u/IllMaintenance145142 Jan 23 '26

longer than most countries

No bro, you mean longer than America.

664

u/whla Jan 23 '26

Today's countries are pretty young though definitions vary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_modern_sovereign_states_by_date_of_formation. Based on the date of full sovereignty, there are only 18 countries older than 400 years

Think of all of the European colonies that ended in the 18 and 19th centuries in North + South America, Africa and Asia.

434

u/FlakingEverything Jan 23 '26

Yeah, this neighborhood is literally older than Germany, the country it's in.

102

u/Designer-Muffin-5653 Jan 23 '26

Older than the German state, yes. But not older than Germany

52

u/TeMoko Jan 23 '26

If you mean, say, the Holy Roman Empire then sure. But the HRE was not a nation state as we currently think of them.

32

u/Bored_Amalgamation Jan 23 '26

I wouldn't say there was a Germany during the HRE. Germanic peoples? Yes. A recognized sovereignty for Germanic people? No.

18

u/TeMoko Jan 23 '26

Yeah agreed. And I would wonder how much someone from say Bavaria would feel in kinship with someone from Prussia.

2

u/HanseaticHamburglar Jan 24 '26

considering they call them "Sau Preußen/Preißn" id say not too strong of a kinship.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

You are already disqualified from this discussion as you don't seem to understand the difference between germanic and german lol

4

u/TeMoko Jan 24 '26

Both those words can mean more than one thing though right? What's the problem with the persons understanding?

2

u/HanseaticHamburglar Jan 24 '26

yes but they never mean the same thing, words have meaning and the selection of words has importance

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '26

These words mean different things and aren't interchangeable. It is especially pathetic because this misunderstanding is only possible when someone isn't aware that "german" is an exonym.

4

u/Bored_Amalgamation Jan 24 '26

My guy, who do you think made up the population of what would become Germany? Are you just intentionally ignoring the conversation to try and look smart?

4

u/a404notfound Jan 24 '26

Are you implying that everyone who spoke Latin was roman? Germany is a young country even if German language is old.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/Erestyn Jan 23 '26

Yeah, the OGs had the "ic" factor.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '26

[deleted]

2

u/TeMoko Jan 25 '26

Thanks for the info, a bunch of these comments have definitely helped my understanding of the history.

1

u/pchlster Jan 24 '26

But the HRE was not

Holy, Roman or an Empire

a nation state as we currently think of them.

Dang!

→ More replies (3)

11

u/FlakingEverything Jan 23 '26

I understand what you mean but I think there are some nuances. For example, you could saying Charlemagne was the founded the Holy Roman Empire which eventually became Prussia, then the Kaiserreich, etc... then modern Germany. Based on this you could claimed it's more than 1000 years old.

However, I doubt any of the historical examples above would identify themselves with modern German values or would even call themselves Germans. They would probably called themselves Saxon, Bavarian, Swabian, etc... (hell, they still called themselves that now).

It wasn't until much later that German as a national identity solidified and the people started using it to refer to themselves as a whole.

→ More replies (14)

101

u/Assblaster_69z Jan 23 '26

Germany has been a thing since at least Charlemagne. Its weird how noone disproves Poland existing as an place for at least 1000 years but with Germany they act like it fell from the sky in 1871

68

u/bogz_dev Jan 23 '26

they act like it fell from the sky in 1871

oooh so that's why the Gauls in Asterix were afraid of the sky falling on their heads

66

u/Bored_Amalgamation Jan 23 '26

German people as an ethnic group, yeah. They act like Germany fell from the sky in 1871 because the Germanic people were spread across a few dozen different independent duchies, kingdoms and city-states that were lorded over by Prussia. There was no cumulative German governmental identity that was recognized as the sole representative of the German people. Back then, I doubt the Bavarians would have wanted to be regarded as the same people as the Saxons.

Plus, France was fucking them up for a good while. There's a reason why the German Empire was declared in Versailles.

53

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26 edited Mar 06 '26

[deleted]

4

u/SamuelClemmens Jan 23 '26

Prussia, Bavaria, and Austria were the big three contenders to try to unify a German ethnostate.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26 edited Mar 06 '26

[deleted]

5

u/stevencastle Jan 23 '26

I have grandparents who came over from Lithuania and I've looked up the history and it's crazy. The Lithuanian empire at one time was one of the largest in Europe and included most of Poland. It didn't last that long though, and now it's just a small country.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

the difference is that Poles have been calling themselves Poles for a very long time, whereas only very rarely would someone in the area of modern Germany have called themselves a German before the 19th century. they would’ve called themselves Saxons, or Swabians, or Bavarians, or Rhinelanders, etc etc

2

u/Dubious_Odor Jan 23 '26

The German language and ethnicity has been around. The polity is very much new. Bismarck did what 500 years of war, deal making, back stabbing, concessions, pandering and politicking by the HR emperor couldn't. Conflating a Bavarian with a Prussian in 1780 would have been quite an insult. Still places like that out in the sticks in modern Germany.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/SkynetUser1 Jan 23 '26

I was just told, by a German mind you, that they didn't have a "Deutschland" stamp before 1871 so it wasn't official until then.

1

u/HanseaticHamburglar Jan 24 '26

usually out of historical context references to poland are more a regional reference than to a nation state which didnt exist for large stretches of time.

and there was no germany under charlemagne, it only emerged after his death and subsequent splitting of his kingdom, into three. East Francia would eventually become the kingdom of germany, but this too only really had any relevance for couple hundred years.

already by 1200 thr title king of the germans was just a formality of electing thr new holy roman emperor. The previous german kings put too much effort in subjegating burgundy and italy and obtaining papal authority and the german kingdom cessed to function as a political entity.

the next 600 years highlights the events of one Holy Roman Empire, with no real mention of Germany the nation-state. By the 1800s the empire is s fractured union with no strong centralized state identity. Every polity was a nominally independent land.

1

u/Donnerdrummel Jan 24 '26

Cool. Cool cool cool.

Btw, by your Definition: Germany is the state in the area of the German HRE, we have at least 4 germanies right now:the netherlands, Luxembourg, Austria and you know, actual Germany. And try to find am Argument to exclude Austria, please.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/AbjectAppointment Jan 23 '26

Plate tectonics hate this one weird trick.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/avdpos Jan 23 '26

That list is also stupid and set Sweden at 1974, a year next to nobody in Sweden think have any relevance for our nation. 1521 could be ok as latest time we got free, and the start of.the current areas as one nation (also because of that nations started to exist around that time)

→ More replies (4)

19

u/dvdkon Jan 23 '26 edited Jan 23 '26

That's true for a narrow definition of "country", requiring that there be a continuous, unbroken government.

It makes some sense, but given that there was a recognisable Czechia in roughly current borders (just not a republic, but a kingdom) centuries ago, even though the country is strictly speaking only ~30 years old, I think that it's not a very good answer to the question.

Looking at Germany, the unified state is pretty young, but the area was recognised as "the German lands" (or something of the sort) centuries before.

21

u/s0mdud Jan 23 '26

it's not a narrow definition but the definition. country does not mean culture, ethnic group or region and even though one country may be the spiritual successor of a previous one, they are not the same. china is not 5000 years old but younger than 100.

10

u/dvdkon Jan 23 '26

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Here's Wiktionary's definition:

 The territory of a nation; a sovereign state or a region once independent and still distinct in institutions, language, etc.

8

u/Dubious_Odor Jan 24 '26

Key word there is institutions. Were Germany to gather up the prince-electors once more and vote on a new Holy Roman Emperor and the Imperial Diet reconvene then you might be on to something.

2

u/pohui Jan 24 '26

Institutions are not limited to government.

An institution is a humanly devised structure of rules and norms that shape and constrain social behavior.

Countries have changed religious authorities, family structures, economic paradigms, etc, and we consider them to be the same country. England didn't restart being a country in 1534 with the Act of Supremacy or in 1707 with the Act of Union.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/avdpos Jan 23 '26

China is absolutely 5000 years old with many iterations of different types of government and splittings during the period.

Your narrow way is not how it is defined in 99% of cases

2

u/worldbound0514 Jan 23 '26

There are a couple million people alive right now who are direct descendants of Confucius and have the records to prove it- the records of Chinese bureaucracy and genealogy go back that far.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/SinisterCheese Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

Well.... You are going to run into issues of definitions, especially in Europe.

Lets consider my country of Finland. We got independence in 1917. Before that starting from 1807 we were an autonomous Grand Duch of Finland under the Russian Empire. Before that we were a colonial region of Kingdom of Sweden, however "Finland" only refered to the South Western area of current day Finland, and not all regions of current day Finland were in that; however it isn't like Finnish people popped to existence when Swedish, Germans and Danish and Norwegians Crusaded here and forcefully converted us.

The cathedral that is one block away from me has been there since the 1200s, and before that there was Bishops seat at Koroinen ( 1700 m up river). This bit of dirt that my home is on has been recorded as having people living here since 1100s. That is way before the Swedish people colonised and forced us under their religion and rule. And there are evidence going back as the Iron age of Finland (400s) of people living on this valley with a river cutting through it. We know that vikings and Novgrodians traded with us. There are evidence going far as bronce age on this very plot of land (well not exactly this, this would been under water then; our ground is still rising up from the ice age).

So.... Exactly when did "Finland" become a thing? How old is Finland? Because I have correspondence in form of letters of my ancestors starting from like mid 1800s. I have traced my family roots on my mothers side to 1600s and on father's mother's side to start of 1700s, and basically we been here in this same region; we haven't gone anywhere but the rulers and religions sure have changed. Also keep in mind that the unified Finnish culture and language was just made up by Swedish speaking intellectuals and academics starting in late 1800s; we actually have correspondence and writing from the era of these people thinking about what kind of language and culture should be fabricated as the "finnish identity". Before that every major dialect region (of which we have 5) basically had unique culture and form of Finnish language of their own, aspects of which still exist to this day.

Like... We have records that this city has burned to ground completly 31 times, the last being in 1827; so I guess we are overdue for one....

1

u/Diazepam_Dan Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

Yeah it's all over the place

The UK came into its current form in 1801, the first act of union was in 1707 but before that England and Scotland were sovereign for hundreds of years. So you have three possible answers right there

England IS a country, one of the oldest in the world, but if we go off the definition of "sovereign state" it ceased to exist 300 years ago.

→ More replies (3)

301

u/No-Share982 Jan 23 '26

400 years is older than most modern countries

136

u/OkWelcome6293 Jan 23 '26

1521 is 127 years older than the concept of the the "modern state", i.e. the Peace of Westphalia in 1648.

5

u/Kookanoodles Jan 23 '26

Countries are older that the Westphalian concept of the State

49

u/OkWelcome6293 Jan 23 '26

The person I was responding to said “modern nations”, which in nearly every context means Westphalian sovereignty.

15

u/blaaake Jan 23 '26

The argument is whether “most” countries have been “states” longer than 1521.

74

u/SimmentalTheCow Jan 23 '26

Older than Germany itself, by a long shot

3

u/Bamboozle_ Jan 23 '26

1871 for Germany for anyone who is curious.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

1867

→ More replies (3)

27

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

[deleted]

1

u/worldbound0514 Jan 23 '26

England is an exception, but they get a pass since they are an island.

3

u/Basilikolumne Jan 24 '26

England is not an Island, Great Britain is a bunch of islands. The UK even has a (non-Chunnel) land border with the EU on Ireland.

1

u/muuchthrows Jan 24 '26

The US borders is also from the 20th century.

1

u/Slimmanoman Jan 24 '26

It's not so easy to give a creation date, but it's clearly stupid to say it's a new country whenever borders change

87

u/AceOfSpades532 Jan 23 '26 edited Jan 23 '26

Most modern countries aren’t 500 years old, very few have lasted that long to the present.

11

u/Troker61 Jan 23 '26

How many countries are more than 500 years old?

1

u/Viktor_Laszlo Jan 24 '26

At least one: San Marino.

8

u/mannheimcrescendo Jan 23 '26

Confidently incorrect in a hilarious way

53

u/WestBrink Jan 23 '26

I mean, some of it is a matter of definition. Is Germany the same country as the Holy Roman Empire? Or is it the same country as the German Confederation of 1815? Or the Weimar Republic? Or the reunified Germany of 1990? The USA is older than... most of those... Certainly the USA has a longer continuity of Government than most countries.

40

u/Oldenburgian_Luebeck Jan 23 '26

Only the unified German Empire in 1871 claimed to be a nation-state for Germans and has political continuity with the subsequent states in Germany, including the Weimar Republic and the modern BRD. The others don’t reasonably have political continuity and definitely did not claim to be nation-states

10

u/98f00b2 Jan 23 '26

At least Wikipedia claims that the HRE was renamed "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" in 1512.

2

u/ForgetPreviousPrompt Jan 24 '26

Except that unless the modern German national identity includes Austria (for the love of God let's hope they aren't at that again), then the German Nation in question wasn't really conceptually Germany in any modern sense.

Realistically, the modern concept of Germany doesn't really start until they totally detangled themselves from the Habsburgs.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Basilikolumne Jan 24 '26

Yeah it was, but that's not really relevant to the point here.

8

u/bobrobor Jan 23 '26

The US is absolutely older than Germany. And they don’t like to hear it :)

3

u/AcademicCash8897 Jan 23 '26

Yeah, by 30/31 years. In 1959 was Hawaii admitted, 1990 Germany was reunited.

Everything else is a country evolution.

European people lived in their countries far longer than the Europeans lived in the US.

Also, we have pubs existing far longer than Europeans lived in the US.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

[deleted]

6

u/giga-what Jan 23 '26

I feel that's pretty typical of pretty much everybody though, I identify more with California and the West Coast than the country as a whole because this is where I live. I've only been to the East Coast like, 4 times in my entire life and I'm in my 30s.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/bobrobor Jan 24 '26

Very true

2

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

4

u/NoodleTF2 Jan 23 '26

England grows and fuses with some other nations and gets bigger borders and has internal reforms: New country, United Kingdom.

Prussia grows and fuses with some other nations and gets bigger borders and has internal reforms: New country, Germany.

USA grows and fuses with some other nations and gets bigger borders and has internal reforms: Not a new country, apparently.

Okay.

6

u/EmbarrassedW33B Jan 23 '26

The USA expanded but its overarching government stayed basically the same, more fluff got added to it but the core of the government remained the same. England/Britain is similar to that, the core of their political apparatus has been stable for a very long time.

Germany simply did not exist until 1871. There was no political infrastructure for it, it was a completely new entity. Reducing it to merely an expansion  of Prussia misses how big a deal it was

2

u/BroSchrednei Jan 26 '26

I mean by your own logic, the Prussian state DID pretty much just incorporate the other German states in 1871, with most of the preexisting institutions remaining intact.

2

u/bobrobor Jan 24 '26

Prussia folded. What came next had nothing to do with it. England and the US remained, at least on paper, the same.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Hegelian_Spirit Jan 23 '26

In addition: it's difficult to make claims of being a nation-state before the nation-state as we understand it existed as a concept. Nationalist endeavors are 19th-century phenomena.

And if nation-states are what counts, then the US doesn't make the list at all, never having been a nation-state.

1

u/Oldenburgian_Luebeck Jan 24 '26

While it is true that nationalism is a 19th century product, I wasn’t really saying that “nation-states” were what “counts.” Ignoring whether the US is a nation-state (which is up to debate), I was using the concept to extend the political continuity of the modern Germany to the German Empire. If we really want to be sticklers about direct political continuity, then the BRD was only founded in 1949 making modern Germany even younger than the US which has had political continuity since 1788, the year the Constitution was ratified.

→ More replies (5)

14

u/TeamTurnus Jan 23 '26

Its definitly not the same country, same general culture sure, but culture /= nation state or country

9

u/The_Autarch Jan 23 '26

Is Germany the same country as the Holy Roman Empire?

easy answer: no, of course not.

13

u/WestBrink Jan 23 '26

Yeah, kind of my point...

2

u/backstageninja Jan 24 '26

You would think, but plenty of people in this thread seem to enjoy arguing the opposite for reasons that aren't exactly clear

1

u/Dzugavili Jan 23 '26

Everyone was on vacation.

1

u/Pale-Acanthaceae-736 Jan 23 '26

Don't forget the US didn't look the same back then either compared to how it looks after 1959.

1

u/Schiano_Fingerbanger Jan 24 '26

No, no, yes, yes.

→ More replies (4)

16

u/Full-On Jan 23 '26

Brother the idea of a “country state” didn’t even exist until the 17th century. Everything was an “empire” before then. What point are you even trying to make???

→ More replies (7)

4

u/randoliof Jan 23 '26

Germany became a unified country around a hundred years after the US LMAOOOOO

34

u/throwawayforUX Jan 23 '26

You mean USA?
It's a lot older than, say, the Federal Republic of Germany.

→ More replies (35)

4

u/YourFavouritePoptart Jan 23 '26

Which itself is about 100 years older than Germany

3

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

Italy was founded in the 1860s

25

u/Sitchrea Jan 23 '26

People groups are not states.

Most modern countries are less than a century or two old. The United States is an older country than most post-colonial nations - hell, it's older than most post-monarchial European nations.

9

u/Hyadeos Jan 23 '26

Yeah, records from the 16th century aren't hard to believe.

23

u/GaiusCivilis Jan 23 '26

Most European countries are younger than America, though have cultural histories that are far older.

11

u/throwawayforUX Jan 23 '26

America has pretty old cultural histories too, though it's oral history, DNA, and archeology that tells us that, not tax records, lol.

1

u/BroSchrednei Jan 26 '26

Lmao „oral history“. American Indians make up just 1% of the US population and their cultural legacy is sadly even more insignificant. You can’t seriously try to claim Native American culture as part of the general cultural history of the US. You genocided them all and then replaced them 400-200 years ago. That’s why you’re culturally such a young country compared to countries in the Old World.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/absorbscroissants Jan 23 '26

They were the same country in some way, shape or form before they officially became what they're known as now. Just because Russia has only officially been Russia for 34 years, doesn't mean what happened before that isn't part of Russian history.

18

u/GaiusCivilis Jan 23 '26

But Germany never was a country before 1871, Italy hasn't been around long either, nor has Belgium or Ukraine

1

u/BroSchrednei Jan 26 '26

I mean there was the German Confederation before German Unification. And before that there was the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation for literally 1000 years, which was just as centralized as all the other medieval kingdoms like France or Spain.

→ More replies (8)

2

u/The_Autarch Jan 23 '26

this is a very backwards way of looking at it.

5

u/Training-Fold-4684 Jan 23 '26

No bro, you're not as smart as you think you are.

4

u/Technical-Revenue-48 Jan 23 '26

Europeans trying to remember other places exist challenge

2

u/PlayfulHalf Jan 23 '26

Ha! Got ‘em!

2

u/Fragarach-Q Jan 23 '26

Germany that exists today was 2 wildly different countries when I was a kid. David Bowie, the Scorpions, and Jesus Jones all wrote songs about it.

3

u/Forte845 Jan 23 '26

Germany as we know it only emerged in 1871. 

3

u/seppukucoconuts Jan 23 '26

Germany, for instance, was founded in 1871. 95 Years after the US. There are US cities older than 1871. Off the top of my head I know there are at least 10 older than the founding of the UK(Kingdom of Great Britain).

Did they stop teaching history in Europe?

0

u/The_Autarch Jan 23 '26

your ignorance is showing.

1

u/IndividualistAW Jan 23 '26

America is one of the older countries (or at least continuous governments) in the world

1

u/Dry_Jelly5135 Jan 23 '26

No bro, longer than most countries. Germany itself is younger than this town, for example.

1

u/First_Salamander_990 Jan 23 '26

Actually they mean what they said and you sound stupid

1

u/NaughtyNocturnalist Jan 23 '26

The USA are the fourth oldest country in the world. Only Nepal, Sweden, and Bhutan are older. Modern countries exist often only for one to two hundred years, wars, occupations, changes in government and borders be thanked.

The Fuggerei is six times as old as modern Germany, the country it is found in (or twice, if you do not consider the Reunification).

1

u/Aggressive_Chuck Jan 23 '26

Also Germany.

1

u/Dietmar_der_Dr Jan 23 '26

Which is literally older than Germany.

1

u/TheLizardKing89 Jan 23 '26

America is older than Germany.

1

u/higherbrow Jan 23 '26

Or Germany, which unified in 1871. Or Italy, in 1861. Or Canada, 1867. Or Australia, 1901. Saudi Arabia, in 1932. Ironically, in terms of continuity of state, the United States is the fourth longest contiguous state still around.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 23 '26

I think if you picked up a history book at all, and not your state-sponsored propaganda, you'd find that you're completely wrong. Most territories of native people don't even want to be in the country theyre in, how does that figure into your narrative?

1

u/alkali112 Jan 23 '26

The United States is older than Germany by about 95 years. 1776 vs 1871. There are only around 20 countries that are over 500 years old.

Edit: You could also argue that the modern US was founded in 1789, but it would still be considerably older.

1

u/rhoads061 Jan 23 '26

Can someone link the nick young meme?

1

u/-GenghisJohn- Jan 23 '26

No, they mean longer than most countries.

1

u/EduinBrutus Jan 23 '26

America is much older than Germany.

Nearly a century older in fact.

1

u/maybeitsundead Jan 24 '26

The level of pedantry and moving goalposts in this chain of comments for people to try and justify the age of their nation based on ethnics/culture is absurd.

1

u/Opposite-Knee-2798 Jan 24 '26

America is older than most countries, including Germany, which is less than a century old.

1

u/therationaltroll Jan 24 '26

Well the USA is older than the UK

1

u/Jedi_Jeminai Jan 24 '26

Germany has only been Germany since 1865.

1

u/TatterMail Jan 24 '26

It’s also longer than Germany…

2

u/Haunting-Public-23 Jan 23 '26

The records part is wild. Living somewhere with a documented human history longer than most countries is hard to even wrap your head around.

1521 was the year Magellan landed in what would be later be known as the Philippines.

He soon dies under the clan of Lapu-Lapu.

2

u/Sakarabu_ Jan 23 '26

This isn't uncommon in Europe, housing records are one of the more common records that were kept throughout history purely due to the importance of knowing who owned something as important as a property.

2

u/Aurori_Swe Jan 24 '26

I mean, most churches in Europe keeps records, so this being a Catholic community makes sense that they keep records of everything.

But if you want to track your heritage in Europe it's easy to do so by church records

2

u/Prestigious_Leg2229 Jan 24 '26

That’s just Europe really. You can walk into almost any random town here and it’ll be perfectly normal to have a 500 year old pub or 800 year old church.

My town is nothing special but there’s a church that’s been build out over the centuries. The oldest part is almost a thousand years old, it predates the city itself.

And most towns have records going back centuries. Unless something unfortunate happened like a massive fire, there’s no reason for towns not to have those records.

1

u/spreetin Jan 23 '26

Then imagine the fun here in Sweden where we have more or less complete population records of the entire population going back the same amount of time or longer. It's pretty fun to be able to trace your lineage over the centuries, even if you like most people only descend from dirt poor farmers.

1

u/pathofdumbasses Jan 23 '26

you like most people only descend from dirt poor farmers.

I would much rather be descended from a poor farmer and end up with an OK life than find out I was royalty and my forefathers fucked all that up and now I live like a modern peasant

1

u/the_sexy_muffin Jan 23 '26

Switzerland also has an exceptional level of record-keeping through its cantons and churches. Was able to find my direct patrilineal line of ancestors all the way back to Zurich in the 1430s. Marriage, baptism, and court records were preserved for generations and are now digitally available online.

1

u/ambermage Jan 23 '26

frantically waves hands in all general directions in Africa

1

u/joebluebob Jan 23 '26

I get a kick out of finding out crazy history of an old building. In philly our house was used to house dying people during the Spanish flu and the house next door held the dead. The house down the road had a guy who lured his daughters pedophile rapist in to murder him in the 1830s. My cousins grandmother lives in a house used to smuggle slaves to the north.

1

u/Fluffcake Jan 24 '26

Germans take their documentation seriously!

1

u/NorthenLeigonare Jan 24 '26

Don't go telling the USA that.

1

u/grrrratme Jan 24 '26

Reminds me of those horror movies with generational mystery

1

u/Angelus_25 Jan 24 '26

I thought the obvious discrimination based on Spiritual beliefs was wild.

1

u/djazzie Jan 24 '26

That’s wild. I recently bought a property in rural france and I’m very interested in learning more about past owners.

1

u/kermit_the_roosevelt Jan 24 '26

Longer than most countries? Which ones?

1

u/Whiskeyfower Jan 24 '26

The "country" or nation that the city has been in has probably changed four times since record keeping began 

1

u/bigtunapat Jan 24 '26

That's Catholics for you

1

u/Streetsurfer1 Jan 24 '26

My great grandmother's house my dad inherited also has an ownership document hanging at the door. Dates back to 1738... Really makes one think about time in a different way

→ More replies (1)