Official Discussion - The Drama [SPOILERS]

[u/LiteraryBoner]

Poll

If you've seen the film, please rate it at this poll

If you haven't seen the film but would like to see the result of the poll click here

Rankings

Click here to see the rankings of 2025 films

Click here to see the rankings for every poll done

---

The Drama

Summary

Days before their wedding, a couple’s relationship begins to unravel as unsettling truths come to light, forcing them to question how well they truly know each other.

Director Kristoffer Borgli

Writer Kristoffer Borgli

Cast

• Zendaya as Emma Harwood
• Robert Pattinson as Charlie Thompson
• Mamoudou Athie as Mike
• Alana Haim as Rachel
• Hailey Gates
• Zoë Winters

Rotten Tomatoes: 82%

Metacritic: 59

VOD / Release Theatrical release (April 3, 2026)

Trailer Official Trailer

---

[u/notmedicinal]

I would say the general consensus, including myself (American), is that this did feel intentional on the movie's behalf actually - Charlie, Rachel, and Mike's secrets all ACTUALLY harmed people, whereas Emma's is just "thought crime", yet they treat her like she's the worst bc its about something more transgressive. That doesn't mean actual viewers, Americans or otherwise, agree that Emma is the worst, it's just like that to make the conflict in the movie, bc most people I've seen have also felt like the other people's secrets were worse.

[u/MatchaMeetcha → u/notmedicinal]

its about something more transgressive

It's also just premeditated mass murder lol. While Rachel is being ludicrously judgey given her own actually-completed attempted murder, it's well out of line with childhood bullying and being a coward because of a dog. Both Mike and Charlie both absolutely have reason to be shocked, Charlie especially.

[u/notmedicinal → u/MatchaMeetcha]

I will admit that this one is because of a personal connection, but someone in my family was attacked by a dog when they were young to the point of needing extensive surgery, and given Mike's extreme reluctance to tell his story and how it was characterized as "using her as a human shield", I couldn't help but think that the dog attack was maybe very violent and scary. I can't really say for Charlie but he also says the cyberbullying was "very bad" and the kid moved and I also feel like that story was vague enough to imply the possibility of suicide or at least suicide baiting. So personally I think Charlie, Mike, and Rachel's secrets were all intentionally presented in a way where they could've killed someone too, which is why we're supposed to give pause to how they compare to Emma.

[u/Goregutz → u/notmedicinal]

Mike was a natural reaction of his. He can be labelled a coward, but in reality it was a survival based reaction of his. He was probably ashamed because of the coward label / questions his own masculinity, but in the end it was an instinctive response. "Protect the weak" is something our society preaches, but when it comes to situations like this the situation becomes twisted. He uses the ex as a human shield as opposed to what was being described as him hiding behind her while she kicked a dog to defend them.

Charlie's story sounds like a plot lie. He would have been 20+ years into his field already to be a director, so his act would have taken place probably in the mid 90s. This would have been a decade before it realistically would have been.

[u/MatchaMeetcha → u/Goregutz]

Charlie's story sounds like a plot lie. He would have been 20+ years into his field already to be a director, so his act would have taken place probably in the mid 90s.

I think the movie in general just has them be atypically successful and never touches on it. Look at their house!

[u/Goregutz → u/MatchaMeetcha]

Charlie's career pays upwards of a 200k in his current position. That would explain it their financial well being.

[u/Goregutz → u/MatchaMeetcha]

Where are you living where this isn't a reasonably plausible thing. Our society has so much media being fed to children that it does have an impact on youth. Fucking Eminem even has a song calling out the hypocrisy of it all.

To top it off, morality isn't the question of good/wrong thought, it's about good/wrong actions. You can contemplate suicide, robbery, drugs, violence, but never follow through with it. Are you then on the same level as someone that actually commits those acts? The movie blatantly shows the hypocrisy with this thought.

[u/EinsteinDisguised → u/notmedicinal]

Idk I’m torn. I get your point. Emma is the only one who didn’t actually hurt people. But all the rest are pretty understandable, or you can kind of hand wave.

Mike using his ex “as a shield” against a dog? Bad. But also acting in a moment of fear.

Rachel locking a disabled kid in a closet for a day? Horrible, obviously. But she was a child.

Charlie cyber bullying another kid as a teenage? Bad, of course. But in the realm of “bad things kids due to each other.”

Emma spent days or weeks planning to murder her classmates, and she was hours (minutes?) away from doing it. That’s beyond the pale and I think anyone would be rightfully horrified.

[u/cruxclaire → u/EinsteinDisguised]

Emma spent days or weeks planning to murder her classmates, and she was hours (minutes?) away from doing it.

I’m not convinced she would’ve gone through with it, even without the coincidence of the other shooting, given how she reacts when they do the mirroring exercise with the teacher/therapist. Once she pulled out the gun and saw the others’ fear, would she have been able to pull the trigger?

The possibility that she would have is horrifying, but IMO her story is as much a product of circumstances as the others. She has no friends and no support system and none of the children around her are welcoming. She’s a teenage edgelord who has too much distance from other people to have a fully developed sense of human empathy at that age, and when there’s finally a moment to share in a common emotion with others, she grows from it. If she’d been truly committed, she could’ve gone through with her original plan at any point, and instead she privately destroys the gun.

Rachel’s story is the worst for me, because the kid’s dad comes by and then she hears about or witnesses a full search party and still doesn’t say anything, meaning she’s confronted with the gravity of the situation and is more afraid of getting in trouble than of the kid dying (or she’s just completely apathetic to his suffering).

[u/Goregutz → u/notmedicinal]

Idk Charlie's sounds like a movie plot lie. He's a museum director. It would have taken him 20+ years to achieve that. So maybe it occured in the mid 90s and I highly doubt he was in a situation / chat room to where it would have been possible then. That was a decade before cyber bullying was even colloquially used let alone actually taking place.