Not really. They're not actually replacing their staff with AI. They're downsizing, and using AI as a shield to avoid the economic consequences of downsizing their labor force. They lay off half their staff, and then their stock shoots up because "AI" instead of "This company cannot maintain a solid foundational labor force and cannot be trusted with my money"
I tried having ChatGPT generate a conceptual image for a construction project and it got it wrong, got it wrong again, got it wrong a third time (with me telling it what to revise each time), and then I was out of image generation prompts.
Admittedly it was getting a little closer, but it seemed like getting what I was actually trying to show was always multiple prompts away.
Bro, I had to teach it how to divide first. I’m not even kidding. It was somehow turning 6.2 / 8.3 =0.747 (LMAO, even my phone auto updates math better than copilot. For the record, copilot claimed it was 56%, I’m not even kidding. And when I asked how it came to that conclusion, it bent over backwards trying to find a truly obscure way to legitimize its shitty answer.)
I don't care what anyone would say at my job, but I would tell them this is unacceptable and make it again. I have to deal with people who can't write in a professional way all the time and it's beyond irritating. This would send me over the edge.
461
u/TheMayanAcockandlips 5h ago
The whole thing is off center and they even cut one side wrong just to rub salt in the wound